From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754036AbdEFUCO (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 May 2017 16:02:14 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com ([209.85.214.54]:36887 "EHLO mail-it0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750780AbdEFUCG (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 May 2017 16:02:06 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 13:02:04 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: U0CKv9nrfGjmF66tFo1DRnavYuE Message-ID: Subject: Re: [git pull] drm pull for v4.12 To: Dave Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Jani Nikula , Maarten Lankhorst , =?UTF-8?B?VmlsbGUgU3lyasOkbMOk?= Cc: LKML , dri-devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > i915: > vblank evasion improvements These may be "improvements", but they end up being very noisy. I geta fair amount of messages like [drm] Atomic update on pipe (A) took 161 us, max time under evasion is 100 us on my desktop (i7-6700K) and I've seen it once on my laptop (i7-6560U) too. The commit message says "This will make it easier to find cases where we potentially miss vblanks." but I'm not sure how that is the case. There's nothing else helpful in the log, and it doesn't seem to be associated with anything in particular (I'm just at the desktop, running a few xterms and google-chrome). Linus