linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, autofs@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:19:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzGyA8QLmri=un4Wm_TnNavCHAMVoY1tfEoA+_UVxT5OA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzKet5sASgrD==8iZ5m1+-FDpznfuqcNDS5ZyCocwzAbg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Of course, right now autofs leaks kernel stack way more than that one
> possible alignment word: the whole "name[NAME_MAX+1]" array is leaking
> stuff after the name length (and final zero). So the padding is the
> least of the leaking worries.

Oh, we do have that "memset()" there, and it seems to have been there
since the beginning.

I take all that back. Fixing user space is actually possible.

However, the whole "no regressions" part is that we shouldn't require
updated user space, so we should fix the compat mess in the kernel
regardless.  At which point "fixing user space" becomes irrelevant
again, so ..

                  Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-22 18:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-22  2:24 compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22  3:16 ` David Miller
2012-02-22  3:33   ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22  3:47     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22  4:20       ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  4:56       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22  5:43         ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  5:53           ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  5:57             ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  9:32               ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 12:15                 ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 12:39                   ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 12:45                     ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 16:20                       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 15:13                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-23  1:35                   ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22 16:12                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23  1:48                   ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  1:54                     ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  2:21                       ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  6:29                         ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  6:31                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-23 11:20                             ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23 11:26                               ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  8:54                         ` Thomas Meyer
2012-02-23  1:56                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23  2:09                       ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  2:11                         ` Ian Kent
2012-02-23  2:25                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-23  2:32                           ` Ian Kent
2012-02-25 11:28               ` Thomas Meyer
2012-02-25 22:10               ` [PATCH] autofs4: fix compilation without CONFIG_COMPAT Andreas Schwab
2012-02-26  1:31                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-26  1:46                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-26  1:53                     ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-26  3:07                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-26  9:05                   ` Andreas Schwab
2012-02-27  7:29                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2012-02-27  9:09                     ` Heiko Carstens
2012-02-27 16:22                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-27 16:25                         ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-27  9:20                     ` Ian Kent
2012-02-22  6:02           ` compat: autofs v5 packet size ambiguity - update H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 16:10             ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 17:43               ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 17:45               ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-22 18:16                 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-02-22 18:19                   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2012-02-22 18:20                   ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+55aFzGyA8QLmri=un4Wm_TnNavCHAMVoY1tfEoA+_UVxT5OA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=autofs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=thomas@m3y3r.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).