From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751967Ab2LJVrr (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:47:47 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:56158 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751455Ab2LJVrq (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:47:46 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20121210214256.GB23484@liondog.tnic>
References: <50C32D32.6040800@iskon.hr> <50C3AF80.8040700@iskon.hr>
 <alpine.LFD.2.02.1212081651270.4593@air.linux-foundation.org>
 <20121210110337.GH1009@suse.de> <20121210163904.GA22101@cmpxchg.org>
 <20121210180141.GK1009@suse.de> <50C62AE6.3030000@iskon.hr>
 <CA+55aFwNE2y5t2uP3esCnHsaNo0NTDnGvzN6KF0qTw_y+QbtFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <50C6477A.4090005@iskon.hr> <CA+55aFx9XSjtMZNuveyKrxL0LUjmZpFvJ7vzkjaKgQZLCs9QCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121210214256.GB23484@liondog.tnic>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:47:23 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4_nuEPYIS7rNLoPVYg6eeM-ApQU
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzPa1tk_uWs_1cyYD0XpjWg_Fn+o431hUk3AnabOeUXSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: kswapd craziness in 3.7
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>
> Aren't we gonna consider the out-of-tree vbox modules being loaded and
> causing some corruptions like maybe the single-bit error above?
>
> I'm also thinking of this here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/6/317

Yup, that looks more likely, I agree.

                Linus