linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	lwn@lwn.net, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request from pty_write [was: Linux 4.4.2]
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 16:38:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzQzCKhX73bUYwNMK8Dd9ECtmav8u7ds2aXKjEo7DV3Gg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CF72EA.9040009@suse.cz>

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> Interestingly, RBP contains address inside try_to_wake_up --
> ffffffff810a535a (dunno why) which is:
> ffffffff810a5355:       e8 66 a0 ff ff          callq  ffffffff8109f3c0
> <ttwu_stat>
> ffffffff810a535a:       e9 9d fe ff ff          jmpq   ffffffff810a51fc
> <try_to_wake_up+0x3c>
>
> ttwu_stat does in the begginning:
> mov    $0x16e80,%r14
>
> which is what we actually still have in r14 when it crashes. The first
> ttwu_stat's "if" has to go through the true branch (otherwise r14 would
> be overwritten).

Hmm. That does sound very much like it might be ttwu_stat() that has
gotten the stack frame wrong, and when finishes exits, it does

        popq    %rbp
        ret

but in fact it popped the return address, and then returned to a crazy address.

Which sounds like a corrupted stack pointer (not a corrupted stack).

Can you make just the "vmlinux" file available somewhere?

In my own private configuration, ttwu_stat() doesn't actually touch
the stack at all - no stack pointer action anywhere except for the

ttwu_stat:
1:      call    __fentry__
        pushq   %rbp
   ..
        movq    %rsp, %rbp      #,

 .....

        popq    %rbp
        ret

but yeah, as Peter says, maybe an exception screwed up %rsp somehow..

I really don't see how it would happen here - that code doesn't look
particularly odd.

And the fentry code used by the function tracer can certainly screw
things up, but even that would be hard-pressed to screw up %rbp, since
the saving of rbp comes *after* fentry. Old pre-__fentry__ gcc
versions had a much higher likelihood (the whole mcount thing is a
disaster, but I'm assuming you have a compiler that does __fentry__
and have CC_USING_FENTRY set?)

               Linus

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-26  0:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-17 20:37 Linux 4.4.2 Greg KH
2016-02-17 20:37 ` Greg KH
2016-02-25 10:12 ` BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request from pty_write [was: Linux 4.4.2] Jiri Slaby
2016-02-25 18:40   ` Peter Hurley
2016-02-25 19:09     ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-25 19:23       ` Steven Rostedt
2016-02-26  8:25         ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-25 20:32       ` Peter Hurley
2016-02-25 20:51         ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-25 21:32           ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-25 22:33             ` Peter Hurley
2016-02-26  0:38               ` Peter Hurley
2016-02-26  8:45                 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-26  0:38             ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2016-02-26  8:56               ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-26  9:23                 ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-26  9:50                   ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-26 16:34                     ` Greg KH
2016-02-26 17:12                 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-29 15:45                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-26 17:52                 ` Peter Hurley
2016-02-25 21:43           ` Peter Hurley
2016-02-25 22:00           ` Jiri Kosina
2016-02-26  8:31             ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-26  8:15     ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-26 18:05 Linus Torvalds
2016-02-26 18:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-02-26 18:18 ` Peter Hurley
2016-02-26 19:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-02-26 19:59   ` Robert Święcki
2016-02-29  7:39     ` Jiri Slaby
2016-02-29 12:43       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+55aFzQzCKhX73bUYwNMK8Dd9ECtmav8u7ds2aXKjEo7DV3Gg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lwn@lwn.net \
    --cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).