From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754894Ab2AIALl (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:11:41 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:40032 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754738Ab2AIALj (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:11:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120108235338.GR23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20120105022318.GG23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20120108235039.GQ23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20120108235338.GR23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 16:11:17 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: EIwCA_whcmQiJZosZnDBHkD_m48 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs pile 1 To: Al Viro Cc: Miklos Szeredi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Toshiyuki Okajima Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Al Viro wrote: > > ... and sure enough, ext3 has the same piece of fun. Hmm. Do we want to have the s_remove_count games for this "temporarily zero nlink" case? Maybe we don't want to do drop_nlink/set_nlink? Does it matter? Anyway, mind sending me a patch with changelog and sign-off? Linus