From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751717AbdKFW5X (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:57:23 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-f196.google.com ([209.85.223.196]:55922 "EHLO mail-io0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751060AbdKFW5V (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:57:21 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QHpK4POjVGYXGgbF7KvfuAyJrJINBAZXUeAeG0W9AKCvFZ8W/wG/Xcb9ioryw+0GLfjkZYT6ko0ga8WYmlz/Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171106224635.qopgsszwxzuitkpf@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> References: <20171029225155.qcum5i75awrt5tzm@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <20171029231835.3725fnd5yehlmqob@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> <20171030110511.scfrdtlnf5lbdhu5@pd.tnic> <526e7cf2-0672-e44b-c32f-26128a2dfd37@codeaurora.org> <20171106224635.qopgsszwxzuitkpf@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 14:57:20 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: nyAnv2Zzyc3OlGz_CyUifgWed6A Message-ID: Subject: Re: [v4.14-rc8 ghes_copy_tofrom_phys] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at lib/ioremap.c:165 To: Fengguang Wu , James Morse Cc: Tyler Baicar , Borislav Petkov , Len Brown , Tony Luck , Huang Ying , Chen Gong , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Will Deacon , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux ACPI , Timur Tabi , Mark Rutland Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > I can see that in RC8, too: James Morse posted a new version of his series to fix this, and it's gotten a few tests, but not a lot. Since you clearly have GHES support on at least some of your machines, it might be worth adding that series from James to 0day testing. The patches look good to me, and I assume I'll be be getting it through Rafael from the ACPI tree (which is how the other ghes code reaches me), but maybe by now for 4.15 with a stable backport. The actual problem is definitely not new. Only the warning message. So the code should work as well as it ever has, which may or may not be saying a lot. It might be worth fixing for 4.14 just to not scare people too much with messages, but at the same time it's not a _functional_ regression. Linus