Re: kernel 3.2.1: BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x10000100

From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>
To: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: kernel 3.2.1: BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x10000100
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:49:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA4Cq5BRfKEa1uckVbtCGKhKmuw1tujQ19T3wk3c5CcsAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC9WiBgzg-dD5Sba9Cd_uvsfMxqQib+vsXXDyMSMSR_Y7P_CCw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> We've had a few similar issues reported in Fedora yesterday after we
>> rebased to 3.2.1.
>
> From which kernel did you rebase to 3.2.1 ?

Fedora 16 went from 3.1.9 to 3.2.1 earlier this week.  We hadn't been getting
reports like this until 3.2.1 showed up.  I asked one of the reporters to try
3.2.0 and they say it recreates there still, so it seems the issue showed up
with the 3.2 release.  One user managed to capture the trace below using a
kernel with a variety of debug options turned on.  It isn't the same backtrace
but it might be related.

backtrace:
:BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
drivers/base/power/runtime.c:785
:in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 0, name: swapper/0
:1 lock held by swapper/0/0:
: #0:  (&chip->rts51x_suspend_timer){+.-...}, at: [<ffffffff8108d711>]
run_timer_softirq+0x111/0x600
:Pid: 0, comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W    3.2.0-2.fc17.x86_64.debug #1
:Call Trace:
: <IRQ>  [<ffffffff8105ee7a>] __might_sleep+0x13a/0x1f0
: [<ffffffffa00180b0>] ? rts51x_modi_suspend_timer+0x50/0x50 [ums_realtek]
: [<ffffffff813fdee3>] __pm_runtime_idle+0xa3/0xb0
: [<ffffffffa00180b0>] ? rts51x_modi_suspend_timer+0x50/0x50 [ums_realtek]
: [<ffffffff8146ed30>] usb_autopm_put_interface+0x30/0x40
: [<ffffffffa0018125>] rts51x_suspend_timer_fn+0x75/0x80 [ums_realtek]
: [<ffffffff8108d7a6>] run_timer_softirq+0x1a6/0x600
: [<ffffffff8108d711>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x111/0x600
: [<ffffffff81084700>] __do_softirq+0xe0/0x370
: [<ffffffff8101fcc3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x13/0x80
: [<ffffffff8167f27c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
: [<ffffffff8101a3e5>] do_softirq+0xa5/0xe0
: [<ffffffff81084d15>] irq_exit+0xe5/0xf0
: [<ffffffff8167fc3e>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x99
: [<ffffffff8167daf3>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x73/0x80
: <EOI>  [<ffffffff8101fd39>] ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10
: [<ffffffff81363f9b>] ? intel_idle+0xfb/0x160
: [<ffffffff81363f97>] ? intel_idle+0xf7/0x160
: [<ffffffff814fa7f3>] cpuidle_idle_call+0xb3/0x520
: [<ffffffff81017265>] cpu_idle+0xe5/0x130
: [<ffffffff8164aff3>] rest_init+0xd7/0xe4
: [<ffffffff8164af1c>] ? csum_partial_copy_generic+0x16c/0x16c
: [<ffffffff81f60c39>] start_kernel+0x3ec/0x3f9
: [<ffffffff81f60347>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x132/0x136
: [<ffffffff81f6044b>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x100/0x10f

Not sure if that is a common trend yet or not.

josh

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784345
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784414