From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932163Ab2LDOfK (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:35:10 -0500 Received: from mail-vc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.220.174]:63615 "EHLO mail-vc0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932138Ab2LDOfF (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:35:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20121203143146.549859007@decadent.org.uk> <20121203143156.904709715@decadent.org.uk> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:35:04 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ 67/89] drm/radeon: properly track the crtc not_enabled case evergreen_mc_stop() From: Josh Boyer To: "Deucher, Alexander" Cc: Ben Hutchings , Greg KH , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Deucher, Alexander wrote: >> > The original patches should go into 3.6 kernels as well: >> > >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=4 >> a15903db02026728d0cf2755c6fabae16b8db6a >> > >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=6 >> 2444b7462a2b98bc78d68736c03a7c4e66ba7e2 >> > >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=8 >> 04cc4a0ad3a896ca295f771a28c6eb36ced7903 >> > >> > I've been meaning to follow up on it, but I haven't had the time. Do I need >> to send explicit patches to stable@vger or can I just ask the above commits >> be cherrypicked to 3.6? >> > >> >> Normally the CC tag works. Not entirely sure why it didn't for the one >> patch I asked about. The other two commits you've highlighted here are >> lacking any sort of stable tag, so you'd have to pipe up here about them. > > The patches were not initially a bug fix per se, so I didn't cc stable. It was only later that I got reports of the patches fixing issues for some people. Normally I add the stable cc if the patch is a bug fix. > >> >> I went ahead and tried the cherry-pick myself on top of 3.6.9, in the >> order you specified above. The 62444b7462a has a trivial conflict coming >> back. I've attached an mbox with these three patches. If you want to >> give them a glance over and OK them, that would be great. > > They look good to me. Thanks! > > Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher Thanks Alex. We've had a couple of users successfully test a kernel with these 3 patches applied for rhbz 855275. Greg, is the mbox enough or would you like me to send them separately to the list? josh