From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>
To: jerry.hoemann@hp.com
Cc: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>,
"Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
kexec <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 08/11] kexec: Disable at runtime if the kernel enforces module loading restrictions
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 16:14:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA6HayQJEDFisvXYJKyoKDbJh53fWki=Arbn_9t=NppGrw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130904200959.GE8540@anatevka.fc.hp.com>
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:09 PM, <jerry.hoemann@hp.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 07:50:15PM -0400, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> kexec permits the loading and execution of arbitrary code in ring 0, which
>> is something that module signing enforcement is meant to prevent. It makes
>> sense to disable kexec in this situation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
>
>
> Matthew,
>
> Disabling kexec will disable kdump, correct?
Yes.
> Are there plans to enable kdump on a system where secure
> boot is enabled?
Vivek Goyal has been working on this. I've not seen the code yet, but
I believe it should be posted somewhere relatively soon. We're also
planning on talking about it at the Secure Boot microconference at
Linux Plumbers in two weeks.
josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-04 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-03 23:50 Matthew Garrett
2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 01/11] Add secure_modules() call Matthew Garrett
2013-09-04 0:45 ` James Morris
2013-09-05 2:14 ` joeyli
2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 02/11] PCI: Lock down BAR access when module security is enabled Matthew Garrett
2013-09-04 0:45 ` James Morris
2013-09-04 16:57 ` David Woodhouse
2013-09-04 17:04 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-04 18:58 ` David Woodhouse
2013-09-04 19:01 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-04 19:31 ` David Woodhouse
2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 03/11] x86: Lock down IO port " Matthew Garrett
2013-09-04 0:45 ` James Morris
2013-09-05 3:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-05 3:58 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-05 15:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 04/11] ACPI: Limit access to custom_method Matthew Garrett
2013-09-04 0:46 ` James Morris
2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 05/11] asus-wmi: Restrict debugfs interface when module loading is restricted Matthew Garrett
2013-09-04 0:46 ` James Morris
2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 06/11] Restrict /dev/mem and /dev/kmem " Matthew Garrett
2013-09-04 0:47 ` James Morris
2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 07/11] acpi: Ignore acpi_rsdp kernel parameter " Matthew Garrett
2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 08/11] kexec: Disable at runtime if the kernel enforces module loading restrictions Matthew Garrett
2013-09-04 0:48 ` James Morris
2013-09-04 20:09 ` jerry.hoemann
2013-09-04 20:12 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-04 20:14 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2013-09-08 6:40 ` Greg KH
2013-09-08 6:44 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-08 7:24 ` Greg KH
2013-09-08 14:40 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-08 15:51 ` Kees Cook
2013-09-08 16:18 ` Greg KH
2013-09-08 16:24 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-08 16:39 ` Greg KH
2013-09-08 16:59 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-08 17:22 ` Greg KH
2013-09-08 17:25 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-08 17:11 ` James Bottomley
2013-09-08 17:15 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-08 17:22 ` James Bottomley
2013-09-08 17:27 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-08 17:32 ` James Bottomley
2013-09-08 17:38 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 09/11] uswsusp: Disable when module loading is restricted Matthew Garrett
2013-09-04 0:48 ` James Morris
2013-09-05 3:20 ` joeyli
2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 10/11] x86: Restrict MSR access " Matthew Garrett
2013-09-04 0:49 ` James Morris
2013-09-03 23:50 ` [PATCH V3 11/11] Add option to automatically enforce module signatures when in Secure Boot mode Matthew Garrett
2013-09-04 1:42 ` James Morris
2013-09-04 1:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-05 3:13 ` joeyli
2013-09-05 8:24 ` joeyli
2013-09-05 10:16 ` Matt Fleming
2013-09-05 12:54 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-04 15:53 ` Kees Cook
2013-09-04 16:05 ` Re: Josh Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+5PVA6HayQJEDFisvXYJKyoKDbJh53fWki=Arbn_9t=NppGrw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jerry.hoemann@hp.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).