From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF598C4332E for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 21:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F37652B1 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 21:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231628AbhCHV4X (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:56:23 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41544 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229740AbhCHV4A (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 16:56:00 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x630.google.com (mail-pl1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::630]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B10F0C06175F for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:56:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x630.google.com with SMTP id a24so5516230plm.11 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 13:56:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=U6vx5H19Z/O1TnXd/t+CXw4LK6hHo0WtPQwXZKiOmm8=; b=UHRPWU+DnioGx4ycir9gGdEmH/2nSbShB7cGtND/lVTbYw0DeZI3lUfVclsbwMbtDc raQx/zYjrgIj+FTM0rMArI2uQzOHyG/WRcbuk/2CvDCANNe1UuC+iVi+29VxhZYz+ZUN 3a58Ol8boRuQGBY+y2xLcwp7PLrWbIvAy/o5gASjAhavLubHv80JB2JeLue1QDx17n7l E/V8rcdd5sHwsdvc2rL/rcFK5AD7gJa5xLlfH/Eckmc6ZQyeSF++jKvR3VTmLKA1alDR MxDLe2sAg3gzDDwpYXmHo+1TThU0h4SpeUfuzzAStms2KZmy4QM+rHMBuG4ZxH0LhPgX Ffgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=U6vx5H19Z/O1TnXd/t+CXw4LK6hHo0WtPQwXZKiOmm8=; b=oGBxM1WIGe2cWXZpp4TGZsLtHanxbjbGsG9z5aILustSrW90QwpIfeUP5ylqtUDKdk oszMHgX1QiCOxm7CcKizyVLeJ/PvVZB3RzrBqWlKmWzUG0B63w04QD+0ogdVws+7WLAX 4u7xCYWFnI/+4IYABMlrCAUuZxoNzvBtAjqRB0Z5VIeL2fZ7IqaJZgJJOQgCcpMu0GFY feuWOiHwta1RpZ5yYkJwE7jKP1VprRlaWVmFguwsyEsDJxQQKNu+alPhshfs8HXQGqoh yXSm3CyzZr4jZ2lg8DA02mXFQuAxQd5xB2LnyIMK9ozpEANyBgm4sfbggglUY6Am0/x1 siSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339ZIrVOrfO3iCqauskz8Y0qod6iN7UJU9vFOoNlal1yZzljZwZ CopymDYCOHZ+4sp7YA5/aTJxAR4Z/KImR8HSnNEzGzEmxC5yBQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzjXmi4G6MSuxOSRUfpJUFYTBQWvzZUKsHrFVVnWspoeFmSsV9qMPBg7fDiUHar0J3Xdur5PBF4YKhZKVizP8o= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c589:b029:e6:3a39:d4a0 with SMTP id p9-20020a170902c589b02900e63a39d4a0mr3859480plx.76.1615240559998; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 13:55:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210212172235.507028-1-jbhayana@google.com> <20210212172235.507028-2-jbhayana@google.com> <20210221144616.4eef6a79@archlinux> <20210308042842.e6qr4xxp5tl5ahos@bogus> <20210308194841.525ed61f@archlinux> In-Reply-To: <20210308194841.525ed61f@archlinux> From: Jyoti Bhayana Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:55:49 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] iio/scmi: Adding support for IIO SCMI Based Sensors To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Sudeep Holla , Hartmut Knaack , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , "David S. Miller" , Rob Herring , Lukas Bulwahn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Cristian Marussi , Enrico Granata , Mikhail Golubev , Igor Skalkin , Peter Hilber , Ankit Arora , kernel test robot Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Jonathan, I looked at ib-iio-scmi-5.12-rc1 branch and the changes look good to me. Once again, thanks for all your help. Thanks, Jyoti On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 11:48 AM Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 04:28:42 +0000 > Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:30:37AM -0800, Jyoti Bhayana wrote: > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > > > Thanks for the detailed and careful review of this patch. Good to hear > > > that v7 is not required. Please find below answers to your > > > questions. Looking forward to seeing this patch merged in the next > > > cycle. Thanks for your help in making this happen. > > > > > > > Any update on this ? Please share the branch with is patch so that I > > can pull and ask Cristian to make his changes on top. > Running a bit behind at the moment. > > Anyhow, there should now be an ib-iio-scmi-5.12-rc1 branch > on https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git > > Includes making the various long long local variables explicitly > s64 and u64 as relevant. > > Based on the rc1 that eats babies so handle with care :) > > I've also merge this into the togreg branch of iio.git. > As explained above that wasn't entirely trivial so Jyoti > please take a quick look and check that changes are fine. > Pushed out as testing to let the autobuilders poke at it. > Assuming they don't find anything, it should be fine > for Sudeep to merge that ib and everything will unwind > nicely in Linus' tree next cycle. > > There is a bit of an ongoing discussion of an earlier patch > in the IIO tree, so I might end up redoing this merge > if I need to rebase to sort that out, but I'll make sure > the diff is the same (git ID might change). > > Thanks, > > Jonathan > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Sudeep >