From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752198AbbCMGrt (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 02:47:49 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:43051 "EHLO mail-we0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751900AbbCMGrq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 02:47:46 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1426175362-8640-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org> References: <1426175362-8640-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:47:45 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 RFC] ath10k: wmi: match wait_for_completion_timeout return type From: Michal Kazior To: Nicholas Mc Guire Cc: Kalle Valo , Network Development , linux-wireless , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-DomainID: tieto.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12 March 2015 at 16:49, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > Return type of wait_for_completion_timeout is unsigned long not int. > An appropriately named unsigned long is added and the assignments fixed up. > Rather than returning 0 (timeout) or a more or less random remaining time > (completion success) this return 0 or 1 which also resolves the type of the > functions being int. > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire > --- > > Checking the call-sites of ath10k_wmi_wait_for_unified_ready and > ath10k_wmi_wait_for_service_ready the positive return value (remaining > time in jiffies) is never passed up the call-chain nor used so it is > cleaner to treat this like a boolean success/fail only (actually the two > functions should probably be of type bool - but that does not seem to be > common practice in the ath10k code base) It'd make sense to have these functions return 0 or -ETIMEDOUT. In that case both call sites would need to be adjusted to treat "< 0" or "!x" as an error (instead of the current "<= 0") condition and not set -ETIMEDOUT themselves. Michał