From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753523Ab2BFRkd (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:40:33 -0500 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:46096 "EHLO mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752848Ab2BFRkc convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:40:32 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120206.114917.1450321525231150955.davem@davemloft.net> References: <59b9c48e067528d94b260b044e1b375c56c97040.1328445742.git.netdev@pradeepdalvi.com> <20120206.114917.1450321525231150955.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 23:10:30 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] netdev: ethernet dev_alloc_skb to netdev_alloc_skb From: "Pradeep A. Dalvi" To: David Miller Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:19 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: "Pradeep A. Dalvi" > Date: Sun,  5 Feb 2012 18:20:10 +0530 > >> From: Pradeep A Dalvi >> >> Replaced deprecating dev_alloc_skb with netdev_alloc_skb in drivers/net/ethernet >>   - Removed extra skb->dev = dev after netdev_alloc_skb >> >> Signed-off-by: Pradeep A Dalvi > > Applied, but again I had to fix things: > >> -    p = dev_alloc_skb(IEEE802_3_SZ + DE4X5_ALIGN + 2); >> +     p = netdev_alloc_skb(dev, IEEE802_3_SZ + DE4X5_ALIGN + 2); >  ... >> -    p = dev_alloc_skb(len + 2); >> +     p = netdev_alloc_skb(dev, len + 2); > > Leave existing indentation alone. > >> -             skb = dev_alloc_skb(ugeth->ug_info->uf_info.max_rx_buf_length + >> -                                 UCC_GETH_RX_DATA_BUF_ALIGNMENT); >> +             skb = netdev_alloc_skb(ugeth->ndev, >> +                             ugeth->ug_info->uf_info.max_rx_buf_length + >> +                             UCC_GETH_RX_DATA_BUF_ALIGNMENT); > > Line up subsequent lines of a multiline series of function arguments > properly, each should start at the first column after the function calls > openning parenthesis. Thanks a lot again! And would remember about these too.