linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
To: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: maz@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ardb@kernel.org, qwandor@google.com, dbrazdil@google.com,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] KVM: arm64: Restrict hyp stage-1 manipulation in protected mode
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:45:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+EHjTzpoX+rLQHwUbR3BVY_XJEWERiG4AGk7SW6GDtDFC_cuQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210719104735.3681732-14-qperret@google.com>

Hi Quentin,

On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:48 AM Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> wrote:
>
> The host kernel is currently able to change EL2 stage-1 mappings without
> restrictions thanks to the __pkvm_create_mappings() hypercall. But in a
> world where the host is no longer part of the TCB, this clearly poses a
> problem.
>
> To fix this, introduce a new hypercall to allow the host to share a
> range of physical memory with the hypervisor, and remove the
> __pkvm_create_mappings() variant. The new hypercall implements
> ownership and permission checks before allowing the sharing operation,
> and it annotates the shared pages in the hypervisor stage-1 and host
> stage-2 page-tables.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h              |   2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mm.h          |   2 -
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c            |  12 +-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c         | 105 ++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c                  |   4 +-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c                          |  14 ++-
>  7 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> index 9f0bf2109be7..78db818ae2c9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
>  #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___vgic_v3_save_aprs              13
>  #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___vgic_v3_restore_aprs           14
>  #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_init                      15
> -#define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_create_mappings           16
> +#define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_host_share_hyp            16
>  #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_create_private_mapping    17
>  #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_cpu_set_vector            18
>  #define __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___pkvm_prot_finalize             19
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> index b39047463075..f37e4d3b831b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mem_protect.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ extern struct host_kvm host_kvm;
>
>  int __pkvm_prot_finalize(void);
>  int __pkvm_mark_hyp(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end);
> +int __pkvm_host_share_hyp(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end);
>
>  int host_stage2_idmap_locked(u64 start, u64 end, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
>  int kvm_host_prepare_stage2(void *pgt_pool_base);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mm.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mm.h
> index c76d7136ed9b..c9a8f535212e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/mm.h
> @@ -24,8 +24,6 @@ int hyp_back_vmemmap(phys_addr_t phys, unsigned long size, phys_addr_t back);
>  int pkvm_cpu_set_vector(enum arm64_hyp_spectre_vector slot);
>  int pkvm_create_mappings(void *from, void *to, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
>  int pkvm_create_mappings_locked(void *from, void *to, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
> -int __pkvm_create_mappings(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
> -                          unsigned long phys, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
>  unsigned long __pkvm_create_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys, size_t size,
>                                             enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> index 1632f001f4ed..f05ecbd382d0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> @@ -140,14 +140,12 @@ static void handle___pkvm_cpu_set_vector(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
>         cpu_reg(host_ctxt, 1) = pkvm_cpu_set_vector(slot);
>  }
>
> -static void handle___pkvm_create_mappings(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> +static void handle___pkvm_host_share_hyp(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
>  {
> -       DECLARE_REG(unsigned long, start, host_ctxt, 1);
> -       DECLARE_REG(unsigned long, size, host_ctxt, 2);
> -       DECLARE_REG(unsigned long, phys, host_ctxt, 3);
> -       DECLARE_REG(enum kvm_pgtable_prot, prot, host_ctxt, 4);
> +       DECLARE_REG(phys_addr_t, start, host_ctxt, 1);
> +       DECLARE_REG(phys_addr_t, end, host_ctxt, 2);
>
> -       cpu_reg(host_ctxt, 1) = __pkvm_create_mappings(start, size, phys, prot);
> +       cpu_reg(host_ctxt, 1) = __pkvm_host_share_hyp(start, end);
>  }
>
>  static void handle___pkvm_create_private_mapping(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> @@ -193,7 +191,7 @@ static const hcall_t host_hcall[] = {
>         HANDLE_FUNC(__vgic_v3_restore_aprs),
>         HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_init),
>         HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_cpu_set_vector),
> -       HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_create_mappings),
> +       HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_host_share_hyp),
>         HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_create_private_mapping),
>         HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_prot_finalize),
>         HANDLE_FUNC(__pkvm_mark_hyp),
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> index 6f28edf58407..20b3cb3fdc67 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> @@ -262,6 +262,111 @@ static int host_stage2_idmap(u64 addr)
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> +static int hyp_range_is_shared_walker(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,
> +                                     kvm_pte_t *ptep,
> +                                     enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags flag,
> +                                     void * const arg)
> +{
> +       enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot;
> +       kvm_pte_t pte = *ptep;
> +
> +       if (!kvm_pte_valid(pte))
> +               return -EPERM;
> +
> +       prot = kvm_pgtable_hyp_pte_prot(pte);
> +       if (!prot)
> +               return -EPERM;
nit: is this check necessary?

> +       /* Check that the page has been shared with the hypervisor before */
> +       if (prot != (PAGE_HYP | KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_SHARED | KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_BORROWED))
> +               return -EPERM;
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int hyp_range_is_shared(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
> +{
> +       struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
> +               .cb = hyp_range_is_shared_walker,
> +               .flags = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
> +       };
> +
> +       return kvm_pgtable_walk(&pkvm_pgtable, (u64)__hyp_va(start),
> +                               end - start, &walker);
> +}
> +
> +static int check_host_share_hyp_walker(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level,

nit: It seems the convention is usually addr,size or start,end. Here
you're using addr,end.

> +                                      kvm_pte_t *ptep,
> +                                      enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags flag,
> +                                      void * const arg)
> +{
> +       enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot;
> +       kvm_pte_t pte = *ptep;
> +
> +       /* If invalid, only allow to share pristine pages */
> +       if (!kvm_pte_valid(pte))
> +               return pte ? -EPERM : 0;
> +
> +       prot = kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot(pte);
> +       if (!prot)
> +               return -EPERM;
> +
> +       /* Cannot share a page that is not owned */
> +       if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_BORROWED)
> +               return -EPERM;
> +
> +       /* Cannot share a page with restricted access */
> +       if ((prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX) ^ KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX)
nit: isn't this clearer as

if ((prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX) != KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX)


> +               return -EPERM;
> +
> +       /* Allow double-sharing (requires cross-checking the hyp stage-1) */
> +       if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_SHARED)
> +               return hyp_range_is_shared(addr, addr + 1);

Why addr+1, rather than end?

> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int check_host_share_hyp(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
> +{
> +       struct kvm_pgtable_walker walker = {
> +               .cb = check_host_share_hyp_walker,
> +               .flags = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_LEAF,
> +       };
> +
> +       return kvm_pgtable_walk(&host_kvm.pgt, start, end - start, &walker);
> +}
> +
> +int __pkvm_host_share_hyp(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
> +{
> +       enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       if (!range_is_memory(start, end))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       hyp_spin_lock(&host_kvm.lock);
> +       hyp_spin_lock(&pkvm_pgd_lock);
> +
> +       ret = check_host_share_hyp(start, end);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto unlock;
> +
> +       prot = KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_RWX | KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_SHARED;
> +       ret = host_stage2_idmap_locked(start, end, prot);

Just for me to understand this better. The id mapping here, which
wasn't taking place before this patch, is for tracking, right?

Thanks,
/fuad


> +       if (ret && ret != -EAGAIN)
> +               goto unlock;
> +
> +       prot = PAGE_HYP | KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_SHARED | KVM_PGTABLE_STATE_BORROWED;
> +       ret = pkvm_create_mappings_locked(__hyp_va(start), __hyp_va(end), prot);
> +       /* XXX - undo host stage-2 changes if ret != 0 */
> +
> +unlock:
> +       hyp_spin_unlock(&pkvm_pgd_lock);
> +       hyp_spin_unlock(&host_kvm.lock);
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
>  int __pkvm_mark_hyp(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
>  {
>         int ret;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c
> index dde22e2a322a..95f6c34a38ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mm.c
> @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ u64 __io_map_base;
>  struct memblock_region hyp_memory[HYP_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS];
>  unsigned int hyp_memblock_nr;
>
> -int __pkvm_create_mappings(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
> -                         unsigned long phys, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
> +static int __pkvm_create_mappings(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
> +                                 unsigned long phys, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
>  {
>         int err;
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 0625bf2353c2..2158d1e00acd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -259,10 +259,8 @@ static int __create_hyp_mappings(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
>  {
>         int err;
>
> -       if (!kvm_host_owns_hyp_mappings()) {
> -               return kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_create_mappings,
> -                                        start, size, phys, prot);
> -       }
> +       if (WARN_ON(!kvm_host_owns_hyp_mappings()))
> +               return -EINVAL;
>
>         mutex_lock(&kvm_hyp_pgd_mutex);
>         err = kvm_pgtable_hyp_map(hyp_pgtable, start, size, phys, prot);
> @@ -302,6 +300,14 @@ int create_hyp_mappings(void *from, void *to, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
>         if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
>                 return 0;
>
> +       if (!kvm_host_owns_hyp_mappings()) {
> +               if (WARN_ON(prot != PAGE_HYP))
> +                       return -EPERM;
> +               return kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_host_share_hyp,
> +                                        kvm_kaddr_to_phys(from),
> +                                        kvm_kaddr_to_phys(to));
> +       }
> +
>         start = start & PAGE_MASK;
>         end = PAGE_ALIGN(end);
>
> --
> 2.32.0.402.g57bb445576-goog
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-21 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-19 10:47 [PATCH 00/14] Track shared pages at EL2 in protected mode Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 01/14] KVM: arm64: Provide the host_stage2_try() helper macro Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 13:57   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 02/14] KVM: arm64: Optimize kvm_pgtable_stage2_find_range() Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 03/14] KVM: arm64: Continue stage-2 map when re-creating mappings Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 12:14   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 13:32     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20  8:26       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:56         ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 04/14] KVM: arm64: Rename KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_S2_IGNORED Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 05/14] KVM: arm64: Don't overwrite ignored bits with owner id Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 12:55   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 13:39     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20  8:46       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 06/14] KVM: arm64: Tolerate re-creating hyp mappings to set ignored bits Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:17   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-20 10:30     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:59       ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-20 11:14         ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 07/14] KVM: arm64: Enable forcing page-level stage-2 mappings Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 14:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 15:36     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 08/14] KVM: arm64: Add support for tagging shared pages in page-table Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 14:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 15:49     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 10:13       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-20 11:48         ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-20 13:48   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-20 14:06     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-21  7:34       ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 09/14] KVM: arm64: Mark host bss and rodata section as shared Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 15:01   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-07-19 15:56     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 10/14] KVM: arm64: Enable retrieving protections attributes of PTEs Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 11/14] KVM: arm64: Expose kvm_pte_valid() helper Quentin Perret
2021-07-21  8:20   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 12/14] KVM: arm64: Refactor pkvm_pgtable locking Quentin Perret
2021-07-21  8:37   ` Fuad Tabba
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 13/14] KVM: arm64: Restrict hyp stage-1 manipulation in protected mode Quentin Perret
2021-07-21 10:45   ` Fuad Tabba [this message]
2021-07-21 13:35     ` Quentin Perret
2021-07-19 10:47 ` [PATCH 14/14] KVM: arm64: Prevent late calls to __pkvm_create_private_mapping() Quentin Perret

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+EHjTzpoX+rLQHwUbR3BVY_XJEWERiG4AGk7SW6GDtDFC_cuQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dbrazdil@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=qwandor@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).