linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
To: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: maz@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, will@kernel.org,
	qperret@google.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	alexandru.elisei@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, andreyknvl@gmail.com,
	vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, elver@google.com, keirf@google.com,
	yuzenghui@huawei.com, ardb@kernel.org, oupton@google.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/17] KVM: arm64: Implement protected nVHE hyp stack unwinder
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 10:58:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+EHjTzyK+bhtbC3xU5zCnsTDHpAKFqP3sp3LYFXjkHfPn8o-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220721055728.718573-15-kaleshsingh@google.com>

Hi Kalesh,

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 6:58 AM Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> wrote:
>
> Implements the common framework necessary for unwind() to work in
> the protected nVHE context:
>    - on_accessible_stack()
>    - on_overflow_stack()
>    - unwind_next()
>
> Protected nVHE unwind() is used to unwind and save the hyp stack
> addresses to the shared stacktrace buffer. The host reads the
> entries in this buffer, symbolizes and dumps the stacktrace (later
> patch in the series).
>
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>

Cheers,
/fuad


>  arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h |  2 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h   | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
> index be7920ba70b0..73fd9e143c4a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ enum stack_type {
>         STACK_TYPE_OVERFLOW,
>         STACK_TYPE_SDEI_NORMAL,
>         STACK_TYPE_SDEI_CRITICAL,
> +       STACK_TYPE_HYP,
>         __NR_STACK_TYPES
>  };
>
> @@ -186,6 +187,7 @@ static inline int unwind_next_common(struct unwind_state *state,
>          *
>          * TASK -> IRQ -> OVERFLOW -> SDEI_NORMAL
>          * TASK -> SDEI_NORMAL -> SDEI_CRITICAL -> OVERFLOW
> +        * HYP -> OVERFLOW
>          *
>          * ... but the nesting itself is strict. Once we transition from one
>          * stack to another, it's never valid to unwind back to that first
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> index 8f02803a005f..c3688e717136 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/nvhe.h
> @@ -39,10 +39,19 @@ static inline void kvm_nvhe_unwind_init(struct unwind_state *state,
>         state->pc = pc;
>  }
>
> +static inline bool on_hyp_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
> +                               struct stack_info *info);
> +
>  static inline bool on_accessible_stack(const struct task_struct *tsk,
>                                        unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
>                                        struct stack_info *info)
>  {
> +       if (on_accessible_stack_common(tsk, sp, size, info))
> +               return true;
> +
> +       if (on_hyp_stack(sp, size, info))
> +               return true;
> +
>         return false;
>  }
>
> @@ -60,12 +69,27 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_nvhe_init_params, kvm_init_params);
>  static inline bool on_overflow_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
>                                      struct stack_info *info)
>  {
> -       return false;
> +       unsigned long low = (unsigned long)this_cpu_ptr(overflow_stack);
> +       unsigned long high = low + OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE;
> +
> +       return on_stack(sp, size, low, high, STACK_TYPE_OVERFLOW, info);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool on_hyp_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
> +                               struct stack_info *info)
> +{
> +       struct kvm_nvhe_init_params *params = this_cpu_ptr(&kvm_init_params);
> +       unsigned long high = params->stack_hyp_va;
> +       unsigned long low = high - PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> +       return on_stack(sp, size, low, high, STACK_TYPE_HYP, info);
>  }
>
>  static inline int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
>  {
> -       return 0;
> +       struct stack_info info;
> +
> +       return unwind_next_common(state, &info, NULL);
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
>  #else  /* !CONFIG_PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE */
> @@ -75,6 +99,12 @@ static inline bool on_overflow_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
>         return false;
>  }
>
> +static inline bool on_hyp_stack(unsigned long sp, unsigned long size,
> +                               struct stack_info *info)
> +{
> +       return false;
> +}
> +
>  static inline int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
>  {
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.37.0.170.g444d1eabd0-goog
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-21  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-21  5:57 [PATCH v5 00/17] KVM nVHE Hypervisor stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 01/17] arm64: stacktrace: Add shared header for common stack unwinding code Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 02/17] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out on_accessible_stack_common() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 03/17] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out unwind_next_common() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 04/17] arm64: stacktrace: Handle frame pointer from different address spaces Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  9:57   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 05/17] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out common unwind() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-25 14:05   ` Mark Brown
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 06/17] arm64: stacktrace: Add description of stacktrace/common.h Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  9:57   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 07/17] KVM: arm64: On stack overflow switch to hyp overflow_stack Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 08/17] KVM: arm64: Add PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE Kconfig Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  9:57   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 09/17] KVM: arm64: Allocate shared pKVM hyp stacktrace buffers Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  9:57   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 10/17] KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of pKVM HYP stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  9:58   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 11/17] KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of non-protected nVHE " Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  9:58   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 12/17] KVM: arm64: Save protected-nVHE (pKVM) hyp stacktrace Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  9:58   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-22 15:33   ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-22 17:28     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 13/17] KVM: arm64: Prepare non-protected nVHE hypervisor stacktrace Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  9:58   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 14/17] KVM: arm64: Implement protected nVHE hyp stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  9:58   ` Fuad Tabba [this message]
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 15/17] KVM: arm64: Implement non-protected " Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  9:58   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 16/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce pkvm_dump_backtrace() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  9:59   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-22 11:16   ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-22 17:25     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  5:57 ` [PATCH v5 17/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce hyp_dump_backtrace() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  9:59   ` Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 20:35   ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-22  0:01     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-21  9:55 ` [PATCH v5 00/17] KVM nVHE Hypervisor stack unwinder Fuad Tabba
2022-07-21 16:06   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-22 10:48 ` Oliver Upton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+EHjTzyK+bhtbC3xU5zCnsTDHpAKFqP3sp3LYFXjkHfPn8o-Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=keirf@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).