linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Wei Wang <weiwan@google.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] virtio: fix up virtio_disable_cb
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:01:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSe_SjUY4JxR6G9b8a0nx-MfQOkLdHJSzmjpuRG4BvsVPw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210413054733.36363-2-mst@redhat.com>

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 1:47 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> virtio_disable_cb is currently a nop for split ring with event index.
> This is because it used to be always called from a callback when we know
> device won't trigger more events until we update the index.  However,
> now that we run with interrupts enabled a lot we also poll without a
> callback so that is different: disabling callbacks will help reduce the
> number of spurious interrupts.

The device may poll for transmit completions as a result of an interrupt
from virtnet_poll_tx.

As well as asynchronously to this transmit interrupt, from start_xmit or
from virtnet_poll_cleantx as a result of a receive interrupt.

As of napi-tx, transmit interrupts are left enabled to operate in standard
napi mode. While previously they would be left disabled for most of the
time, enabling only when the queue as low on descriptors.

(in practice, for the at the time common case of split ring with event index,
little changed, as that mode does not actually enable/disable the interrupt,
but looks at the consumer index in the ring to decide whether to interrupt)

Combined, this may cause the following:

1. device sends a packet and fires transmit interrupt
2. driver cleans interrupts using virtnet_poll_cleantx
3. driver handles transmit interrupt using vring_interrupt,
    detects that the vring is empty: !more_used(vq),
    and records a spurious interrupt.

I don't quite follow how suppressing interrupt suppression, i.e.,
skipping disable_cb, helps avoid this.

I'm probably missing something. Is this solving a subtly different
problem from the one as I understand it?

> Further, if using event index with a packed ring, and if being called
> from a callback, we actually do disable interrupts which is unnecessary.
>
> Fix both issues by tracking whenever we get a callback. If that is
> the case disabling interrupts with event index can be a nop.
> If not the case disable interrupts. Note: with a split ring
> there's no explicit "no interrupts" value. For now we write
> a fixed value so our chance of triggering an interupt
> is 1/ring size. It's probably better to write something
> related to the last used index there to reduce the chance
> even further. For now I'm keeping it simple.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-13 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-13  5:47 [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] virtio net: spurious interrupt related fixes Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-13  5:47 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] virtio: fix up virtio_disable_cb Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-13  8:51   ` Jason Wang
2021-04-13 14:01   ` Willem de Bruijn [this message]
2021-04-13 19:53     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-13 21:44       ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-04-13 22:11         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-14  0:24           ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-04-13  5:47 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/4] virtio_net: disable cb aggressively Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-13  8:53   ` Jason Wang
2021-04-13 14:08     ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-04-13 14:33     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-13  5:47 ` [PATCH RFC v2 3/4] virtio_net: move tx vq operation under tx queue lock Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-13  8:54   ` Jason Wang
2021-04-13 14:02     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-13 14:20       ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-04-13 19:38         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-13  5:47 ` [PATCH RFC v2 4/4] virtio_net: move txq wakeups under tx q lock Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+FuTSe_SjUY4JxR6G9b8a0nx-MfQOkLdHJSzmjpuRG4BvsVPw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=weiwan@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).