From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA861C433DF for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD7C2067B for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 16:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="AfaS5Jbk" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726485AbgFBQEt (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:04:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45746 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726140AbgFBQEs (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:04:48 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x244.google.com (mail-lj1-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::244]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F17BBC08C5C1 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 09:04:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lj1-x244.google.com with SMTP id u10so12030653ljj.9 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 09:04:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TdASVYRd1oNcB8z3lm3vXKwpIMfs10a1pt94BdFhokU=; b=AfaS5JbkkfQMHNCpjwv78O6KVcnyrd4QGShVbk4K/7pEB3PJCV+g5Vf2unfyLucHSb 7VSl8SFQiW+BNM7k2dMWP2e4e639+dzM7/EYEhs4kfC+jH6oV9HvYtLgYbU/bd6i/8MF 0wVLgi/YfesNh09a1h5XIZsRdR24kV13KsettgC19TXNVW02srl+iHkZIqbGLjkMBJKR dHWRpr0rtGOeKmDHU1Fuz9fJsHiBElviuiO1gsZK/BTPUfflKWsnxZSx1R7ZMxstlsy5 ZzUn1aG8cQ08b33K2iZNceKw0uLh2wEaKF7Rjq6kTNTAOGsevXGHTyY0jVCRNH2Smcs5 Ymkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TdASVYRd1oNcB8z3lm3vXKwpIMfs10a1pt94BdFhokU=; b=Ys7D5rfFqcEExRqh9W2Z/WlxmbNKzrpn/+FmE91wo9VQrAAe7apaSaCz4uQzTU0DKS 8OJ58p9YNUBLxFZBayzpg33clFVUvETpKBhIC96gApb1V06tAa2cDgxemGPbob2Yxf22 kw706sYl2bCKDMTLOFvw6ZoCgLvWTnUp+VSG4Jq8dV8iteEk+3kUUFSORnzB1xvMEa4h nsIXmkKEKlvWIkzZvjpAe6dwEc1c/X/enS+tBFLtmVHfUU8/E9GgGrI9xX3JaMcgmQHj 6Ug+xHnEPy5cPMuHCwWMB6RN6gr2i8SBAa0erKz3X/ZjzFefdUV/sgaPJdw+NgmG0tS6 259g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530WkoM1+lCmI0yMPFtpuBfctGq2459mcwOPV3Ikwkec8CR73Czr PtNy+xjS17ATs54Sy4OqGhDZL5phFv8zs8PYoOB1OQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz9tp/aYek/IMn73T2R1tTC8IqsxYdWZXPCqIjy6DkFciXG4xeSR4Wxrn03fkzWFSkjbZVhS2VyT6GY9/Hjwo8= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9a4f:: with SMTP id k15mr10127288ljj.55.1591113885989; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 09:04:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200602101841.662517961@linuxfoundation.org> <3c900c0e-b15c-da05-d3d8-e68acf660076@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: <3c900c0e-b15c-da05-d3d8-e68acf660076@roeck-us.net> From: Naresh Kamboju Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 21:34:34 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/59] 4.9.226-rc2 review To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , open list , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Shuah Khan , patches@kernelci.org, Ben Hutchings , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, linux- stable , Russell King - ARM Linux Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + Russell King On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 21:07, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 6/2/20 3:23 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.226 release. > > There are 59 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 04 Jun 2020 10:16:52 +0000. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Many arm builds still fail as attached. Is it really only me seeing this problem ? > We have noticed this problem. > FWIW, if we need/want to use unified assembler in v4.9.y, shouldn't all unified > assembler patches be applied ? This is reported on stable mailing list https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20200601203710.GR1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk/T/#t > > $ git log --oneline v4.9..c001899a5d6 arch/arm | grep unified > c001899a5d6c ARM: 8843/1: use unified assembler in headers > a216376add73 ARM: 8841/1: use unified assembler in macros > eb7ff9023e4f ARM: 8829/1: spinlock: use unified assembler language syntax > 32fdb046ac43 ARM: 8828/1: uaccess: use unified assembler language syntax > 1293c2b5d790 ARM: dts: berlin2q: add "cache-unified" to l2 node > 75fea300d73a ARM: 8723/2: always assume the "unified" syntax for assembly code > > I am quite concerned especially about missing commit 75fea300d73a, > which removes the ARM_ASM_UNIFIED configuration option. That means it is > still present in v4.9.y, but the failing builds don't enable it. Given that, > the build failures don't seem to be surprising. > > Guenter > > --- > Build reference: v4.9.225-60-g6915714f12d0 > gcc version: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 > > Building arm:allmodconfig ... failed > -------------- > Error log: > arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S: Assembler messages: > arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:158: Error: bad instruction `ldclne p11,cr0,[r10],#32*4' > arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.S:233: Error: bad instruction `stclne p11,cr0,[r0],#32*4' > make[2]: *** [arch/arm/vfp/vfphw.o] Error 1 > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > make[1]: *** [arch/arm/vfp] Error 2 > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > -------------- > > Building arm:s3c2410_defconfig ... failed > -------------- > Error log: > arch/arm/lib/changebit.S: Assembler messages: > arch/arm/lib/changebit.S:15: Error: bad instruction `strbne r1,[ip]' > make[2]: *** [arch/arm/lib/changebit.o] Error 1 > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > arch/arm/lib/clear_user.S: Assembler messages: > arch/arm/lib/clear_user.S:33: Error: bad instruction `strbtal r2,[r0],#1' > arch/arm/lib/clear_user.S:34: Error: bad instruction `strbtle r2,[r0],#1' > arch/arm/lib/clear_user.S:35: Error: bad instruction `strbtlt r2,[r0],#1' > arch/arm/lib/clear_user.S:39: Error: bad instruction `strtpl r2,[r0],#4' > arch/arm/lib/clear_user.S:39: Error: bad instruction `strtpl r2,[r0],#4' > arch/arm/lib/clear_user.S:42: Error: bad instruction `strtpl r2,[r0],#4' > arch/arm/lib/clear_user.S:44: Error: bad instruction `strbtne r2,[r0],#1' > arch/arm/lib/clear_user.S:44: Error: bad instruction `strbtne r2,[r0],#1' > make[2]: *** [arch/arm/lib/clear_user.o] Error 1 > make[1]: *** [arch/arm/lib] Error 2 > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > Failed builds: > arm:allmodconfig > arm:s3c2410_defconfig > arm:omap2plus_defconfig > arm:imx_v6_v7_defconfig > arm:ixp4xx_defconfig > arm:u8500_defconfig > arm:multi_v5_defconfig > arm:omap1_defconfig > arm:footbridge_defconfig > arm:davinci_all_defconfig > arm:mini2440_defconfig > arm:axm55xx_defconfig > arm:mxs_defconfig > arm:keystone_defconfig > arm:vexpress_defconfig > arm:imx_v4_v5_defconfig > arm:at91_dt_defconfig > arm:s3c6400_defconfig > arm:lpc32xx_defconfig > arm:shmobile_defconfig > arm:nhk8815_defconfig > arm:bcm2835_defconfig > arm:sama5_defconfig > arm:orion5x_defconfig > arm:exynos_defconfig > arm:cm_x2xx_defconfig > arm:s5pv210_defconfig > arm:integrator_defconfig > arm:pxa910_defconfig > arm:clps711x_defconfig