From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB38C4332B for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A657364F96 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229643AbhCQIQo (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 04:16:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58274 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229613AbhCQIQN (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 04:16:13 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2BB1C06174A; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 01:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id n132so40055736iod.0; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 01:16:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AiXh5OFsnN34IitZz1rkVk6moqaTbWiaMgRZ+6LYhf8=; b=gAPnk0yECXq3HyzTLDsOs+NhCxSyJmPDWkC64+ApYo1YnCgqDmc83K+vgu7pHY3qza zwv9V3CO62rt/vydmtLxHcnMvllRWgSPWNNb8W/vopxVHx1giz7MroScEX+NVf52UA3w DwA98pQuO7pUYMJkj5uc5VXCau/Vm8tE1IgznDB+hqEjUEVbLoJrPjt84z1l328YXyjY TWBu96tcOE+w4Gjh7ft6UaYocNI5kFp0ZvKkedAoudwqbZ9V154YFd8WJQTQAECL3iHj DY7niU9Cqwm1J4U7tlqTXjfh4xGov3tgOcj2rVKXiQNIL2zf9FzgYMwcfpwPbIXrKNle 1X6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AiXh5OFsnN34IitZz1rkVk6moqaTbWiaMgRZ+6LYhf8=; b=R2B4FSClhEaSCip9xgPd23mqFGZoag64eMgXbY7PANw0YTvoR6VI4jp0OsdmHZtPTC VSCYrEBx9P2vrZh5AwFPMcjYh/6rsb7L+tASWBLxZuLsI3CYs6hHo6uR+hxEE8P7/9Qg 7cBtrKTLi/6NpYkdnOBw0eBlR5uZVFBK3A9sQrEqfUCiD+z29QwurAzsieSc8e7hiESw rO5ifMH6N/5JP2J5afTRJbiqo9hZkmnQ3/REgDuvZQaR5vsFsxWW+FgxWMfk6cYQSGYg 5YJb7IFEJegk+5Jf8HYMkQSzC0GEYYaWVSFIGRNG2ysBoGEcCNC33wJzlWtRDfJ4YhUH vlcA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531271Z83FpVlNc7Ndc69lj7ZRCyXVUsZxjIAmLOkD+0nsaCaTJa cUpr2qNAslX3wije1/0UFvbXUYxN7hX++RXITB4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdslQWxWHgCfvHpEkB6dz2eb3BbcFgd8hsk2MYpirqFTEXFB8/VV6tyn8gX5McHuvBjPaLLyZSzVtBP8xwcPw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2e82:: with SMTP id m2mr5967050iow.70.1615968973050; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 01:16:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210316155001.699efbb4@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: From: Alexandru Ardelean Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:16:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 16 (AD9467 & ADI_AXI_ADC) To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Michael Hennerich , linux-iio , William Breathitt Gray , Jonathan Cameron Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 11:20 PM Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On 3/15/21 9:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > News: there will be no linux-next release on Friday this week. > > > > Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next are still based on v5.12-rc1, > > so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug. > > > > News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag > > v5.12-rc1{,-dontuse} (or somewhere between v5.11 and that tag), please > > consider rebasing it onto v5.12-rc2. Also, please check any branches > > merged into your branch. > > > > Changes since 20210315: > > > on i386 or x86_64: > > WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ADI_AXI_ADC > Depends on [n]: IIO [=y] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && OF [=n] > Selected by [y]: > - AD9467 [=y] && IIO [=y] && SPI [=y] > > > AD9467 should not select ADI_AXI_ADC when OF is not enabled, > so possibly AD9467 should depend on OF. Hmm, this becomes a bit complicated. We got here because we needed to add a depends on HAS_IOMEM for the ADI_AXI_ADC (due to the s390 arch). Maybe a better fix would be for AD9467 to depend on ADI_AXI_ADC. The AD9467 driver can't function without the ADI_AXI_ADC driver. It is a little early to move this to a "high-speed ADC" subgroup. > > > Full randconfig file is attached. > > > -- > ~Randy > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap