From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8E6C433EF for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 18:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240602AbiC2Si2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2022 14:38:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42902 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239098AbiC2SiZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2022 14:38:25 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CD6F1817B9 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 11:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id k11so4332679ilv.5 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 11:36:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5BCw6nbHB1HhY9C/SvU0SfIcx4iHjYcssyIjUbMoR1g=; b=pS1aGCcGSgnivTPCc+Il/56orxKx1GRGqaqXURoaGtCJJizQNsPh4IxTyQcze5fi8+ 56p8uP51n7/s/VVInLARqXwsvRQePbpi67+umg11D/g1Lppxv4xmiaSd38XfckQ+KfWw dK0qfPW8NCjDwSo+OK1e1VpOJVU3PU8nedbZ1FWU0AcqBBtaGsBvM7qbzjlluLVnWAJ+ OrO9e0wnAxF3rWJGEnLkweq0YJNg860Dx8x/czKBdsvJKzfIjtraMEquEpNx1UdcvFCy mOvlJal56W7OqLZspczniHMcUJNevVGK/1EVRQQlV8pfKoBkD/53/gBEuTfL+P0tnMi0 WXMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5BCw6nbHB1HhY9C/SvU0SfIcx4iHjYcssyIjUbMoR1g=; b=fyltH9mgbZJzYiKNkP4StgnIDP65rPkGEAiTBQ1CVQ03X1kCHU4AJTDASZASsCpRP3 W+3Kl0rfZaIM0D9jgwpVY8tegF/VrF0vJhD/L28OHG1xMInLUmZQf6xmblBp0efG+u10 Skg/rYx7c1K9+UOOZCfFplgEN56V3wIOQQmih3zTP3QdCCxKR7UQYerF/3/1Sc0XmCsS QxOHxakRDz29c0gAWqvVLooYNIJLWipQGDrBj/RoSo77jA6uNJWboUysptD9/rNDf9TB R626KQhjjsJZ1nseyvjsooRnNtjvrnCML8uXT3cLFQ5ESlWJIiX75ip3yeBWbvgBATE2 u22A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530n+cidhkPEa8vp5NCXdxjPMoUcE7b5IEtrLqQjMI5nLiqdekM6 9GmBZNfzVjKiY9v3+4G4agGqqNJf2+SaJ5pedU8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAm+MEvlNtDTnmWisD3LBrjjfAOpYyxgIRIGE0iqWfov1hWQH7t/sgDi7qOlP/TE9Sfe5z60tm9LH77djx/vE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1a43:b0:2c9:8e7c:ed98 with SMTP id u3-20020a056e021a4300b002c98e7ced98mr9055749ilv.235.1648579000098; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 11:36:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Andrey Konovalov Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 20:36:29 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] kasan, arm64, scs, stacktrace: collect stack traces from Shadow Call Stack To: Marco Elver Cc: andrey.konovalov@linux.dev, Alexander Potapenko , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Andrew Morton , Dmitry Vyukov , Andrey Ryabinin , kasan-dev , Mark Rutland , Vincenzo Frascino , Sami Tolvanen , Peter Collingbourne , Evgenii Stepanov , Florian Mayer , Linux Memory Management List , LKML , Andrey Konovalov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 2:36 PM Marco Elver wrote: > > > Changes v1->v2: > > - Provide a kernel-wide stack_trace_save_shadow() interface for collecting > > stack traces from shadow stack. > > - Use ptrauth_strip_insn_pac() and READ_ONCE_NOCHECK, see the comments. > > - Get SCS pointer from x18, as per-task value is meant to save the SCS > > value on CPU switches. > > - Collect stack frames from SDEI and IRQ contexts. > > Do any of these new changes introduce new (noticeable) overhead (in > particular patch 2)? I'll measure the overheads and include the results into v3. Thanks!