From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752969Ab2JEIDe (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2012 04:03:34 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:49132 "EHLO mail-ie0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751402Ab2JEID3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2012 04:03:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121004145022.GA73321@intma.in> References: <20121004145022.GA73321@intma.in> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:03:28 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: udev breakages - was: Re: Need of an ".async_probe()" type of callback at driver's core - Was: Re: [PATCH] [media] drxk: change it to use request_firmware_nowait() From: Emmanuel Benisty To: Kurt H Maier Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:27:01PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: >> >> Al, that -><- close to volunteering for maintaining that FPOS kernel-side... >> > > This would be fantastic. And that would solve this very much worrying issue [1], quoting: "(Yes, udev on non-systemd systems is in our eyes a dead end, in case you haven't noticed it yet. I am looking forward to the day when we can drop that support entirely.)" [1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-August/006066.html