linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [6.1.7][6.2-rc5] perf all metrics test: FAILED!
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 03:24:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUUOZoLOFiBcYkccWPSusk9G_Rhf3DOZYWat-K+VfWFHQw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fULKkEYXOVV5tXd8J0occGJwgV+BiJLkA=exW=bfgyEBw@mail.gmail.com>

?

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 12:21 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 1:59 AM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > [ CC LLVM linux folks + Ben from Debian kernel team ]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am playing with LLVM version 16.0.0-rc1 which was released yesterday and PERF.
> >
> > After building my selfmade LLVM toolchain, I built perf and run some
> > perf tests here on my Intel SandyBridge CPU (details see below).
> >
> > perf all metrics test: FAILED!
> >
> > ...with both Debian's perf version 6.1.7 and my selfmade version 6.2-rc5.
> >
> > Just noticed:
> >
> > Couldn't bump rlimit(MEMLOCK), failures may take place when creating
> > BPF maps, etc
> >
> > Run the below tests with `sudo` - made this go away - still FAILED.
> >
> > But maybe I am missing to activate some sysfs/debug or whatever other stuff?
>
> Hi Sedat,
>
> things have been improving wrt metrics and so this failure may have
> just been because of the addition of a previously missing metric. The
> rlimit thing shouldn't affect things but maybe file descriptors?
> Looking at the test output the issue is:
>
> ```
> Metric 'tma_dram_bound' not printed in:
> # Running 'internals/synthesize' benchmark:
> Computing performance of single threaded perf event synthesis by
> synthesizing events on the perf process itself:
>   Average synthesis took: 207.680 usec (+- 0.176 usec)
>   Average num. events: 30.000 (+- 0.000)
>   Average time per event 6.923 usec
>   Average data synthesis took: 217.833 usec (+- 0.202 usec)
>   Average num. events: 161.000 (+- 0.000)
>   Average time per event 1.353 usec
>
>  Performance counter stats for 'perf bench internals synthesize':
>
>      <not counted>      MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT
>                          (0,00%)
>      <not counted>      CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING
>                          (0,00%)
>      <not counted>      CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD
>                          (0,00%)
>      <not counted>      MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS
>                             (0,00%)
> ```
>
> So the test was checking to see whether the tma_dram_bound metric
> could be computed on your Sandybridge and it failed. The event counts
> below show that every event came back "<not counted>" which is usually
> indicative of a permissions problem - it is also not surprising given
> this that the metric wasn't computed. You could try repeating the
> command the test is trying with something like "perf stat -M
> tma_dram_bound -a sleep 1", but running as root should have resolved
> that issue. Does that give you enough to keep exploring?
>

Hi Ian,

Thanks for your feedback!

I booted into my Debian kernel - just to see what happens.

# cat /proc/version
Linux version 6.1.0-2-amd64 (debian-kernel@lists.debian.org) (gcc-12
(Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40) #1
SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.7-1 (2023-01-18)

All things run as root...

# echo 0 | tee /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict
/proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid
0

# /usr/bin/perf test 10 92 98 99 100 101
10: PMU events                                                      :
10.1: PMU event table sanity                                        : Ok
10.2: PMU event map aliases                                         : Ok
10.3: Parsing of PMU event table metrics                            : Ok
10.4: Parsing of PMU event table metrics with fake PMUs             : Ok
92: perf record tests                                               : Ok
98: perf stat tests                                                 : Ok
99: perf all metricgroups test                                      : Ok
100: perf all metrics test                                           : FAILED!
101: perf all PMU test                                               : Ok

# perf stat -M tma_dram_bound -a sleep 1

Performance counter stats for 'system wide':

    <not counted>      MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT
                  (0,00%)
    <not counted>      CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING
                     (0,00%)
    <not counted>      CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD
              (0,00%)
    <not counted>      MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS
                        (0,00%)

      1,002148600 seconds time elapsed

Hmm... looking at... Metric 'tma_l3_bound' ...

Running...

# perf stat --verbose -M tma_l3_bound -a sleep 1
Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-2A-7
metric expr (MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT /
(MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT + 7 *
MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS)) *
CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING / CLKS for tma_l3_bound
metric expr CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD for CLKS

found event MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT
found event CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING
found event CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD
found event MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS

Parsing metric events
'{MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT/metric-id=MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT/,CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING/metric-id=CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PEND
ING/,CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD/metric-id=CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD/,MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS/metric-id=MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS/}:W'
MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT -> cpu/event=0xd1,period=0xc365,umask=0x4/
CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING ->
cpu/event=0xa3,cmask=0x5,period=0x1e8483,umask=0x5/
CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD -> cpu/event=0x3c,period=0x1e8483/
MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS -> cpu/event=0xd4,period=0x186a7,umask=0x2/

Control descriptor is not initialized

MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT: 0 4007421228 0
CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING: 0 4007421228 0
CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD: 0 4007421228 0
MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS: 0 4007421228 0

Performance counter stats for 'system wide':

    <not counted>      MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.LLC_HIT
                  (0,00%)
    <not counted>      CYCLE_ACTIVITY.STALLS_L2_PENDING
                     (0,00%)
    <not counted>      CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD
              (0,00%)
    <not counted>      MEM_LOAD_UOPS_MISC_RETIRED.LLC_MISS
                        (0,00%)

      1,002310013 seconds time elapsed

So those events/metric-ids resulting in "<not counted>" are all found.

What means "Control descriptor is not initialized"?

To summarize:

Those two tests in "100: perf all metrics test" FAILED:

1. tma_dram_bound
2. tma_l3_bound

Best regards,
-Sedat-

> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> > Last perf version which was OK:
> >
> > ~/bin/perf -v
> > perf version 6.0.0
> >
> > echo "linux-perf: Adjust limited access to performance monitoring and
> > observability operations"
> > echo 0 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict
> > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid
> > 0
> >
> > ~/bin/perf test 10 86 92 93 94 95
> > 10: PMU events                                                      :
> > 10.1: PMU event table sanity                                        : Ok
> > 10.2: PMU event map aliases                                         : Ok
> > 10.3: Parsing of PMU event table metrics                            : Ok
> > 10.4: Parsing of PMU event table metrics with fake PMUs             : Ok
> > 86: perf record tests                                               : Ok
> > 92: perf stat tests                                                 : Ok
> > 93: perf all metricgroups test                                      : Ok
> > 94: perf all metrics test                                           : Ok
> > 95: perf all PMU test                                               : Ok
> >
> > echo 1 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict
> > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid
> > echo "linux-perf: Reset limited access to performance monitoring and
> > observability operations"
> >
> > If you need further information, please let me know.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -Sedat-
> >
> > P.S. Instructions
> >
> > [ REPRODUCER ]
> >
> > LLVM_MVER="16"
> >
> > # Debian LLVM
> > ##LLVM_TOOLCHAIN_PATH="/usr/lib/llvm-${LLVM_MVER}/bin"
> > # Selfmade LLVM
> > LLVM_TOOLCHAIN_PATH="/opt/llvm/bin"
> > if [ -d ${LLVM_TOOLCHAIN_PATH} ]; then
> >    export PATH="${LLVM_TOOLCHAIN_PATH}:${PATH}"
> > fi
> >
> > PYTHON_VER="3.11"
> > MAKE="make"
> > MAKE_OPTS="V=1 -j1 HOSTCC=clang-$LLVM_MVER HOSTLD=ld.lld
> > HOSTAR=llvm-ar CC=clang-$LLVM_MVER LD=ld.lld AR=llvm-ar
> > STRIP=llvm-strip"
> >
> > echo "LLVM MVER ........ $LLVM_MVER"
> > echo "Path settings .... $PATH"
> > echo "Python version ... $PYTHON_VER"
> > echo "make line ........ $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS"
> >
> > LANG=C LC_ALL=C make -C tools/perf clean 2>&1 | tee ../make-log_perf-clean.txt
> >
> > LANG=C LC_ALL=C $MAKE $MAKE_OPTS -C tools/perf
> > PYTHON=python${PYTHON_VER} install-bin 2>&1 | tee
> > ../make-log_perf-install_bin_python${PYTHON_VER}_llvm${LLVM_MVER}.txt
> >
> >
> > [ TESTS ]
> >
> > [ TESTS - START ]
> >
> > echo 0 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict
> > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid
> >
> > [ TESTS - DEBIAN ]
> >
> > /usr/bin/perf -v
> > perf version 6.1.7
> >
> > /usr/bin/perf test 10 92 98 99 100 101
> >
> >  10: PMU events                                                      :
> >  10.1: PMU event table sanity                                        : Ok
> >  10.2: PMU event map aliases                                         : Ok
> >  10.3: Parsing of PMU event table metrics                            : Ok
> >  10.4: Parsing of PMU event table metrics with fake PMUs             : Ok
> >  92: perf record tests                                               : Ok
> >  98: perf stat tests                                                 : Ok
> >  99: perf all metricgroups test                                      : Ok
> > 100: perf all metrics test                                           : FAILED!
> > 101: perf all PMU test                                               : Ok
> >
> > [ TESTS - DILEKS ]
> >
> > ~/bin/perf -v
> > perf version 6.2.0-rc5
> >
> > ~/bin/perf test 7 87 93 94 95 96
> >
> >   7: PMU events                                                      :
> >   7.1: PMU event table sanity                                        : Ok
> >   7.2: PMU event map aliases                                         : Ok
> >   7.3: Parsing of PMU event table metrics                            : Ok
> >   7.4: Parsing of PMU event table metrics with fake PMUs             : Ok
> >  87: perf record tests                                               : Ok
> >  93: perf stat tests                                                 : Ok
> >  94: perf all metricgroups test                                      : Ok
> >  95: perf all metrics test                                           : FAILED!
> >  96: perf all PMU test                                               : Ok
> >
> > [ TESTS - FAILED ]
> >
> > /usr/bin/perf test --verbose 100 2>&1 | tee
> > perf-test-verbose-100-perf-all-metrics-test_debian-perf-6-1-7.txt
> >
> > ~/bin/perf test --verbose 95 2>&1 | tee
> > perf-test-verbose-95-perf-all-metrics-test_dileks-perf-6-2-rc5.txt
> >
> > [ TESTS - STOP ]
> >
> > echo 1 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/kptr_restrict
> > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_paranoid
> >
> > - EOT -

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-30  2:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-29  9:58 [6.1.7][6.2-rc5] perf all metrics test: FAILED! Sedat Dilek
2023-01-29 23:21 ` Ian Rogers
2023-01-30  2:24   ` Sedat Dilek [this message]
2023-01-30 10:04     ` James Clark
2023-01-31  0:20       ` Ian Rogers
2023-01-31  3:45         ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-31  3:55           ` Ian Rogers
2023-01-31  6:14             ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-31  6:20               ` Sedat Dilek
2023-02-01 15:27             ` Liang, Kan
2023-02-01 17:02               ` Ian Rogers
2023-02-01 19:06                 ` Liang, Kan
2023-02-01  6:51         ` Ravi Bangoria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+icZUUOZoLOFiBcYkccWPSusk9G_Rhf3DOZYWat-K+VfWFHQw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benh@debian.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).