From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Linux ACPI" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [4.2-rc4] acpi|drm|i915: circular locking dependency: acpi_video_get_backlight_type
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:33:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUV-A=ipw+B9-UaDHEGP0EosFdCQYEKzv47WK+-u30A7kQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55CDA5D3.9030606@redhat.com>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 13-08-15 16:33, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 12-08-15 21:26, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 08:29:00PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this my first build of a 4.2-rcN Linux-kernel and I see this...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just FYI:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am *not* seeing this with drm-intel-nightly from below url.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, I plan to test Linux v4.2-rc5.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [ CC Linus ]
>>>>
>>>> Knock Knock Knock.
>>>>
>>>> This issue still remains here (with CONFIG_DRM_I915=m)...
>>>>
>>>> [ 18.269792] ======================================================
>>>> [ 18.269798] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
>>>> [ 18.269805] 4.2.0-rc6-1-iniza-small #1 Not tainted
>>>> [ 18.269810] -------------------------------------------------------
>>>> [ 18.269816] modprobe/727 is trying to acquire lock:
>>>> [ 18.269822] (init_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0090f2d>]
>>>> acpi_video_get_backlight_type+0x17/0x164 [video]
>>>> [ 18.269840]
>>>> [ 18.269840] but task is already holding lock:
>>>> [ 18.269848] (&(&backlight_notifier)->rwsem){++++..}, at:
>>>> [<ffffffff810a6519>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x39/0x70
>>>> [ 18.269864]
>>>> [ 18.269864] which lock already depends on the new lock.
>>>> [ 18.269864]
>>>> [ 18.269875]
>>>> [ 18.269875] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>>>> [ 18.269884]
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> Full dmesg log and kernel-config attached.
>>>>
>>>> Shall I add Rusty and modules/modprobe folks?
>>>
>>>
>>> Just got back from vacation and was greeted by this same lockdep splat.
>>>
>>> On a hunch I reverted
>>>
>>> commit 93a291dfaf9c328ca5a9cea1733af1a128efe890
>>> Author: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>> Date: Tue Jun 16 16:27:52 2015 +0200
>>>
>>> ACPI / video: Move backlight notifier to video_detect.c
>>>
>>> and the problem seems to be gone. Hans, any thoughts?
>>
>>
>> Looking into this atm, lockdep clearly is right.
>>
>> Sorry about this I have put a lot of thinking into avoiding
>> these kind of issues with this patch-set, but I did not realize
>> there was another lock "hiding" inside the notifier-chain.
>>
>> Further analysis shows that the lock inside the notifier-chain
>> causes similar problems vs register_count_mutex from
>> drivers/acpi/acpi_video.c. I'm working on a fix for this
>> atm.
>
>
> Heh, look at what I just found (I'm shifting my work focus
> in the direction of nouveau) :
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152876
>
> So it looks like we have had the root cause of this issue
> for a long time already, maybe my recent backlight selection
> logic cleanup / rework has made it easier to trigger the
> lockdep warning for this though.
>
> Anyhow assuming people are ok with the fix I submitted
> yesterday we've a fix for this now.
>
Yay :-)
- sed@ -
> Regards,
>
> Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-14 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-26 22:33 [4.2-rc4] acpi|drm|i915: circular locking dependency: acpi_video_get_backlight_type Sedat Dilek
2015-08-01 12:23 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-08-10 18:29 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-08-12 19:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-13 3:30 ` Zheng, Lv
2015-08-13 6:52 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-08-13 11:58 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-08-13 14:33 ` Hans de Goede
2015-08-13 20:46 ` Sedat Dilek
2015-08-14 8:24 ` Hans de Goede
2015-08-14 9:33 ` Sedat Dilek [this message]
2015-08-13 1:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+icZUV-A=ipw+B9-UaDHEGP0EosFdCQYEKzv47WK+-u30A7kQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).