From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753825AbbBFADe (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 19:03:34 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:38811 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751859AbbBFADc (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 5 Feb 2015 19:03:32 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUVTpQrVUkUBeAP+=tGaHE0GPBsPOOYeB+Rwke-7UkKRew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150205005716.GS5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20150205015144.GT5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<CA+icZUUHBh-voBUfYEwajL7upnj3SJC47zJN-WnRW_7tnEnQsA@mail.gmail.com>
	<54D3186F.7030500@sr71.net>
	<20150205130343.6ac0eda9@gandalf.local.home>
	<20150205130802.289a8be0@gandalf.local.home>
	<54D3B253.3050000@sr71.net>
	<20150205183412.GI5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<54D3B7F5.9070209@sr71.net>
	<20150205184537.GJ5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<CA+icZUX_fi-O3kXymLCPfJ8Sx0yG=m5=pWzJDJpu-iHTyjM78Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150205145816.7c38a7df@gandalf.local.home>
	<CA+icZUUC7vD_FBUWV+WLBx2M-iXvR8E90zWGxmUWQcdmbHiH2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150205152201.49d55905@gandalf.local.home>
	<CA+icZUV9SeWKrWN6Q8-Us-VpOgaz2sXX-RT2he4rwJmOzGQjOw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+icZUXkv2JV0kurGdvOPPavyrY2hb9rjTZ1yQn13gai=qobcw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150205170952.525bdee6@gandalf.local.home>
	<CA+icZUX_f_M7EmV3OM_CeosjfqoMSkJrCgUBm0LKFFurFGRvGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150205181141.6f1d532a@gandalf.local.home>
	<CA+icZUVTpQrVUkUBeAP+=tGaHE0GPBsPOOYeB+Rwke-7UkKRew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 01:03:31 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+icZUV2E_9+J4a=MVak9hViZYHPDyKymYxrcHjfVqBUAs151A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

[...]
>> That said, let's add this (on top of the old patch):
>>
>
> Which old patch?
> "tlb: Don't do trace_tlb_flush() on offline CPUs" ?
>

Or did you mean "x86/mm: Omit switch_mm() tracing for offline CPUs"

- Sedat -