linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
	Dmitry Golovin <dima@golovin.in>,
	Clang-Built-Linux ML <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from compressed kernel
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 14:44:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+icZUVKRZPFX_Q8RRJnFsHrkM5VbiWUEam+6O5XSzgNaqAzPg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUWyFDgieQswvfhWemzymDh_UiVqH2uH52a+0otcr2Pd4w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:33 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:30 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 14:29, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:59 AM Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The compressed kernel currently contains bogus runtime relocations in
> > > > the startup code in head_{32,64}.S, which are generated by the linker,
> > > > but must not actually be processed at runtime.
> > > >
> > > > This generates warnings when linking with the BFD linker, and errors
> > > > with LLD, which defaults to erroring on runtime relocations in read-only
> > > > sections. It also requires the -z noreloc-overflow hack for the 64-bit
> > > > kernel, which prevents us from linking it as -pie on an older BFD linker
> > > > (<= 2.26) or on LLD, because the locations that are to be apparently
> > > > relocated are only 32-bits in size and so cannot normally have
> > > > R_X86_64_RELATIVE relocations.
> > > >
> > > > This series aims to get rid of these relocations. It is based on
> > > > efi/next, where the latest patches touch the head code to eliminate the
> > > > global offset table.
> > > >
> > > > The first patch is an independent fix for LLD, to avoid an orphan
> > > > section in arch/x86/boot/setup.elf.
> > > >
> > > > The second patch gets rid of almost all the relocations. It uses
> > > > standard PIC addressing technique for 32-bit, i.e. loading a register
> > > > with the address of _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ and then using GOTOFF
> > > > references to access variables. For 64-bit, there is 32-bit code that
> > > > cannot use RIP-relative addressing, and also cannot use the 32-bit
> > > > method, since GOTOFF references are 64-bit only. This is instead handled
> > > > using a macro to replace a reference like gdt with (gdt-startup_32)
> > > > instead. The assembler will generate a PC32 relocation entry, with
> > > > addend set to (.-startup_32), and these will be replaced with constants
> > > > at link time. This works as long as all the code using such references
> > > > lives in the same section as startup_32, i.e. in .head.text.
> > > >
> > > > The third patch addresses a remaining issue with the BFD linker, which
> > > > insists on generating runtime relocations for absolute symbols. We use
> > > > z_input_len and z_output_len, defined in the generated piggy.S file, as
> > > > symbols whose absolute "addresses" are actually the size of the
> > > > compressed payload and the size of the decompressed kernel image
> > > > respectively. LLD does not generate relocations for these two symbols,
> > > > but the BFD linker does, prior to the upcoming 2.35. To get around this,
> > > > piggy.S is extended to also define two u32 variables (in .rodata) with
> > > > the lengths, and the head code is modified to use those instead of the
> > > > symbol addresses.
> > > >
> > > > An alternative way to handle z_input_len/z_output_len would be to just
> > > > include piggy.S in head_{32,64}.S instead of as a separate object file,
> > > > since the GNU assembler doesn't generate relocations for symbols set to
> > > > constants.
> > > >
> > > > The last patch adds a check in the linker script to ensure that no
> > > > runtime relocations get reintroduced. Since the GOT has been eliminated
> > > > as well, the compressed kernel has no runtime relocations whatsoever any
> > > > more.
> > > >
> > > > Changes from v1:
> > > > - Add .text.* to setup.ld instead of just .text.startup
> > > > - Rename the la() macro introduced in the second patch for 64-bit to
> > > >   rva(), and rework the explanatory comment.
> > > > - In the last patch, check both .rel.dyn and .rela.dyn, instead of just
> > > >   one per arch.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to test this patchset v2 on top of Linux v5.7-rc7 together with:
> > >
> > > [1] x86/boot: Discard .discard.unreachable for arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux
> > > [2] x86/boot: Correct relocation destination on old linkers
> > >
> > > I tried to pull efi/next on top of Linux v5.7-rc7 and cleaned up the
> > > merge problems, but I am not sure I did it correctly.
> > > So, which patches are really relevant from efi/next?
> > >
> > > What's your suggestions?
> > >
> >
> > efi/next is here:
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git/log/?h=next
> >
> > You'll need the top 3 patches.
>
> Thanks /o\.
>
> - Sedat -

Are those diffs correct when using "x86/boot: Correct relocation
destination on old linkers"?

$ cat ../head_32_S.diff
diff --cc arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.S
index 064e895bad92,03557f2174bf..000000000000
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_32.S
@@@ -49,13 -49,17 +49,14 @@@
   * Position Independent Executable (PIE) so that linker won't optimize
   * R_386_GOT32X relocation to its fixed symbol address.  Older
   * linkers generate R_386_32 relocations against locally defined symbols,
-  * _bss, _ebss, in PIE.  It isn't wrong, just suboptimal compared
 - * _bss, _ebss, _got, _egot and _end, in PIE.  It isn't wrong, just less
 - * optimal than R_386_RELATIVE.  But the x86 kernel fails to properly handle
++ * _bss, _ebss, _end in PIE.  It isn't wrong, just suboptimal compared
 + * to R_386_RELATIVE.  But the x86 kernel fails to properly handle
   * R_386_32 relocations when relocating the kernel.  To generate
-  * R_386_RELATIVE relocations, we mark _bss and _ebss as hidden:
 - * R_386_RELATIVE relocations, we mark _bss, _ebss, _got, _egot and _end as
 - * hidden:
++ * R_386_RELATIVE relocations, we mark _bss, _ebss and _end as hidden:
   */
        .hidden _bss
        .hidden _ebss
 -      .hidden _got
 -      .hidden _egot
+       .hidden _end

        __HEAD
  SYM_FUNC_START(startup_32)

$ cat ../head_64_S.diff
diff --cc arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
index 4b7ad1dfbea6,76d1d64d51e3..000000000000
--- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/head_64.S
@@@ -40,34 -40,11 +40,35 @@@
   */
        .hidden _bss
        .hidden _ebss
 -      .hidden _got
 -      .hidden _egot
+       .hidden _end

        __HEAD
 +
 +/*
 + * This macro gives the relative virtual address of X, i.e. the offset of X
 + * from startup_32. This is the same as the link-time virtual address of X,
 + * since startup_32 is at 0, but defining it this way tells the
 + * assembler/linker that we do not want the actual run-time address of X. This
 + * prevents the linker from trying to create unwanted run-time relocation
 + * entries for the reference when the compressed kernel is linked as PIE.
 + *
 + * A reference X(%reg) will result in the link-time VA of X being stored with
 + * the instruction, and a run-time R_X86_64_RELATIVE relocation entry that
 + * adds the 64-bit base address where the kernel is loaded.
 + *
 + * Replacing it with (X-startup_32)(%reg) results in the offset being stored,
 + * and no run-time relocation.
 + *
 + * The macro should be used as a displacement with a base register containing
 + * the run-time address of startup_32 [i.e. rva(X)(%reg)], or as an immediate
 + * [$ rva(X)].
 + *
 + * This macro can only be used from within the .head.text section, since the
 + * expression requires startup_32 to be in the same section as the code being
 + * assembled.
 + */
 +#define rva(X) ((X) - startup_32)
 +
        .code32
  SYM_FUNC_START(startup_32)
        /*

Thanks.

- Sedat -

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-26 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-01  8:42 [PATCH] x86/boot: allow a relocatable kernel to be linked with lld Dmitry Golovin
2020-05-02  3:43 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-05-15 18:50 ` Borislav Petkov
     [not found]   ` <602331589572661@mail.yandex.ru>
2020-05-17 19:44     ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-17 20:25       ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-18 19:10         ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-05-24 21:28           ` [PATCH 0/4] x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from compressed kernel Arvind Sankar
2020-05-25  7:10             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-05-25 22:59             ` [PATCH v2 " Arvind Sankar
2020-05-26 12:29               ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 12:30                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-05-26 12:33                   ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 12:44                     ` Sedat Dilek [this message]
2020-05-26 14:47                       ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-26 14:50                         ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 15:36                           ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-26 15:38                             ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-27  6:26                             ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 14:48                       ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 14:55                         ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 15:07                           ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 15:31                             ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-27  6:24                               ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-26 16:18                             ` Sedat Dilek
2020-05-25 22:59             ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/boot: Add .text.* to setup.ld Arvind Sankar
2020-05-25 22:59             ` [PATCH v2 2/4] x86/boot: Remove run-time relocations from .head.text code Arvind Sankar
2020-05-25 22:59             ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from head_{32,64}.S Arvind Sankar
2020-05-25 22:59             ` [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/boot: Check that there are no runtime relocations Arvind Sankar
2020-05-26  6:11               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-05-26 15:16                 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-26 17:13                   ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-26 19:14                     ` Arvind Sankar
2020-08-06 11:19                       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-08-06 16:12                         ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-26  0:37             ` [PATCH 0/4] x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from compressed kernel Fangrui Song
2020-05-24 21:28           ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/boot: Add .text.startup to setup.ld Arvind Sankar
2020-05-24 22:13             ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-24 23:00               ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-24 23:49                 ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-24 22:48             ` Brian Gerst
2020-05-24 21:28           ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from .head.text code Arvind Sankar
2020-05-24 22:53             ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-24 23:44               ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-25  0:55                 ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-24 21:28           ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/boot: Remove runtime relocations from head_{32,64}.S Arvind Sankar
2020-05-24 23:22             ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-24 23:58               ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-24 21:28           ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/boot: Check that there are no runtime relocations Arvind Sankar
2020-05-24 23:36             ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-24 23:57               ` Arvind Sankar
2020-05-25  6:10             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-05-25 16:26               ` Fangrui Song
2020-05-25 19:22                 ` Arvind Sankar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+icZUVKRZPFX_Q8RRJnFsHrkM5VbiWUEam+6O5XSzgNaqAzPg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
    --cc=dima@golovin.in \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=maskray@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).