From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BC9C43331 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 05:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2078621670 for ; Sat, 7 Sep 2019 05:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="BDJPAvy+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394449AbfIGFuH (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Sep 2019 01:50:07 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:46639 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2394351AbfIGFuH (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Sep 2019 01:50:07 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id h7so8571382wrt.13 for ; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 22:50:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=rAHu/cSAYCVs27fp3q0UmPkjyf2rH/LgmFmZg+hAKyM=; b=BDJPAvy+0nDI9ZIOq2mVYJrFX0QCi6OJvS0BYFAyzpg9nxVc6vvXACHJQR4ZtkbBI8 ec58qA7asMSTFwHOe9xtWLgcGm0gxrFJkt21XMlGtfyX/1mc8wk6KMQUseggqkeXehkL LEGmHnvQBKpwoIEuvvSJTh+vSAZGjkkNof/UPcpV4wlSj+cuQfuThBhKhQGLaW1wHWRW ixt3bxwEURROxVz6nDHMVwN2f6yguBfvR8BrxygwvY+YAsAhyKd3CYtT7wdAgkxySy6o zpvKBYIHIBo1c+oMnjNZPu2wOdo6Ji01zOR+dZHrAg4uVweDZvKBrJbmR+dAXS9ktrhA 4srQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rAHu/cSAYCVs27fp3q0UmPkjyf2rH/LgmFmZg+hAKyM=; b=MjTta7gc2ggI5n+ECfQ/sxExRF9s6KGJjFuBIDxedcLg+kd08LDztyM4yr8EYZyL92 2XIKHy1ejOWwJ1bdi03jYwNQo9ozq+BV9pltyCXk4hzPlmwyoEq9Ioo2Zx29Lha1Hf9Z ym0UTlQtNAkmqdCyzVBFdZU8gY1t2QD+z23jWXVJqayl/7odjX6LaDyKWeqP/ZeYsOY2 rHzqG5aT/N09C5wBJxNqBjrv6h+v2AQGOIXxwcT7/Of01WKyJWSa3DKuGtcEiy7VX6if WdpIfoZ7w9vgpMbsy8y5t5cEyEcWg7Zg02tXLc0rUxXMCfQPLtM6gMU6AuZ6VQ/deqMk xQWg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUmM9G2tOvn3MOndcLeOvsvbC8Mq1qUPggnh2NEi/t6SNO+enaA ZIbhvnyT5fccjXTZTEMI9DoL/RdHADNbDFp5J7c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyBSWvYprvDU2ClDBrDU+yqGRK8FU/KXz8KkeFblKtdyVpezCMhX+PqWb+OBYgHK8cMEk5wkdWWJdQZc0O3OuI= X-Received: by 2002:adf:e390:: with SMTP id e16mr10418212wrm.29.1567835405086; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 22:50:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190904181740.GA19688@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com From: Sedat Dilek Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2019 07:52:21 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] compiler-attributes for v5.3-rc8 To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Nick Desaulniers , Miguel Ojeda , Will Deacon , Josh Poimboeuf , "Naveen N. Rao" , "David S. Miller" , Paul Burton , Linux List Kernel Mailing , Behan Webster , Behan Webster Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 12:59 AM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 5:45 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > > > Yes. With the appropriate test cycle > > > > Sedat reported the issue and already tested/verified the fix. How > > long should it sit in -next before sending a PR for inclusion to 5.3 > > (as opposed to letting it ride out to 5.4)? > > If the original patch was already in -next, I wouldn't worry about it, > as long as you do enough local testing that there's nothing stupid > going on. > I am the original reporter and tester of the ClangBuiltLinux issue #619 and highly appreciate to have the single fix in Linux v5.3 final. The compiler-attribute patchset sit for some weeks in linux-next, so I have not seen any complains. What I still prefer is to re-integrate the arm64 and sh arch related patches which went through maintainer's trees in linux-next. AFAICS some massage of the commit messages were missing, too. devil's OMG dileks used compiler and linker: LLVM/Clang and LLD v9.0.0-rc3 > The -next cycle is a few days, and even with an rc8 we're getting > close enough to release that I'd rather get it earlier than later. So > I'd rather get a pull request this weekend than then have to deal with > it when traveling next week. > +1 for ASAPISSIMO Thanks for taking care. - Sedat -