From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933011AbcCKREX (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:04:23 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:35206 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932596AbcCKREV (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:04:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160310.144812.2252397711464239518.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20160310.124450.278421705870462421.davem@davemloft.net> <20160310.144812.2252397711464239518.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 22:34:19 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: thunderx: Set recevie buffer page usage count in bulk From: Sunil Kovvuri To: David Miller Cc: Linux Netdev List , LKML , LAKML , Sunil Goutham , Robert Richter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 1:18 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Sunil Kovvuri > Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 23:57:48 +0530 > >> Difference between NIU driver and this patch is there it's >> calculate split count, increment page count and then divide page into >> buffers. Here it's divide page into buffers, have a counter which increments >> at every split and then at the end do a atomic increment of page->_count. >> >> Any issue with this approach ? > > I guess not. Okay, so can i assume you will consider the patch for merging if no other comments are received. Or do you want me to resubmit patches a fresh. ?