Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] drm/msm/dpu: support binding to the mdp5 devices

[Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>]

On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 20:58, Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 at 20:44, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/8/2024 7:01 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > Existing MDP5 devices have slightly different bindings. The main
> > > register region is called `mdp_phys' instead of `mdp'. Also vbif
> > > register regions are a part of the parent, MDSS device. Add support for
> > > handling this binding differences.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h           |  3 +
> > >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_io_utils.c      | 13 +++++
> > >   3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > >
> >
> > I thought we had agreed on a quite version of msm_ioremap_mdss for
> > vbif_nrt_phys?
> >
> > Anyway, its not something to block this change. Hence,
>
> Excuse me, I'll fix it when applying, if I don't forget.

I took another glance. The  msm_ioremap_mdss is already quiet (it is
not printing warnings if the resource is not present), so this should
be fine by default. But I'll make a note that we might be able to
replace most of msm_ioremap functions with the standard devm ioremap
functions.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry