From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A837C04E30 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 18:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2722054F for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 18:48:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1575917314; bh=muHKCaD7T6fXbAMddnaVXcC0vtPeCxDhcuEyWi76OQU=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=CWDrGuBLg6nTvEJfgl+uSQckKGwB6Sy38q7BQHFIVkKy6lbKtiGS1xlTchShb8T6A D1rHz1IMbgLqyCm0MDwzjhD7Znumo3k/id9cMhJ93VtgkntNF5HD4rbp84jIsZKaDy HiHqgMZbSAzwOp4M15JBTM9QpsS4GElWVymzFHQ0= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726668AbfLISsd (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 13:48:33 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f67.google.com ([209.85.166.67]:42162 "EHLO mail-io1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726379AbfLISsd (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 13:48:33 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f67.google.com with SMTP id f82so15891389ioa.9 for ; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 10:48:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Zi2mbcA3dI0Tp/DpO+thSwq2zZZGqpVehuHAqxL+i5c=; b=LGfA1Taelzd+PatnajvxDFPlsISUHMFnQWVwAolBrXJGwNVRpSKxeSHaFDTeMc/ptL hEulU4FMnI7+6PQRJEC6wn5Zz3/ecd+c9iUfpIoXAfZm1Oc+2xGPCXvHwUG6TQ5Zvy2t s5aLS7r1cbj7m0+O93Ae4OUPcSIPg/Nuy9b+Q= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Zi2mbcA3dI0Tp/DpO+thSwq2zZZGqpVehuHAqxL+i5c=; b=oore9DRr2FCuOAMRgTiHGnOYaw/hCeXN6rWpKEAcsEZPUih/epsDIH4gTMCgs+S/NQ LImL3oYqHldBBBnGkNM7+684uM+DPWcaUqRc4gfxVBKqGId/cdAmHOwewP132F/UDbT9 vAy0y94+HG5fcm3/wDep1kmHoaSEkXUoXXpKsPtnouZtiAw26n3ZEDVpSS8izBd7PeYA shMVLgoBThY0Jc3WIdLsTROyhrkWo3SeflXnx76Ilc2VMePhzgYNQ5qN2kyqFDeQElL9 rOyvWkvfmsikDRs6k1Tu+JGMVdO3Tl1Yv/YN/QZbhYxiOandQZgijTz3DDk3iMdBLQnA aGug== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW3fNir2EgtEY/V5eLBBncl05hHqfFuK65CAhgaVBgqyTcNu4Ao tUxkL3ePMF6P+XAbf5Q+gozxNWLpBsAbmFRPWqE2E5jUeBc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqylpzBA/rEOG36qxdMJP/TXW5tXH1kkcXg24MQVyc8HWod7DLw4mYvfIqk4ydMjgej/CHEZBfcOnbDj+lKD+aE= X-Received: by 2002:a02:ce5c:: with SMTP id y28mr28638212jar.96.1575917312372; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 10:48:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191209135823.28465-1-hch@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20191209135823.28465-1-hch@lst.de> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 10:48:20 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: kill off ioremap_nocache To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Paul Burton , James Hogan , Arnd Bergmann , linux-mips , linux-arch , lkml Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 5:58 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Let me know what you think and if this is something acceptable for > just after -rc1. How many conflicts will this result in generally? I like it, but I'd like to have some idea of whether it ends up being one of those "really painful churn" things? A couple of conflicts isn't an issue - they'll be trivial to fix. It's the "this causes fifty silly conflicts" that I worry about, partly because it then makes submaintainers inevitably do the wrong thing (ie "I foresee an excessive amount of 'git rebase' rants next release"). Also, it looks like Google doesn't want this to happen. This whole series was marked as spam for me.I'm not sure why, I don't see anything odd that would trigger it, and DKIM and SPF both passed. Maybe it's you, maybe it's Google, and maybe it's the infradead SRS thing. Linus