From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Joe Burton <jevburton.kernel@gmail.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/9] bpf: Introduce cgroup iter
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 20:00:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJvbgq3j5SUb3OCbkndgpqeYNAv4Xgo2gOav0mC2f=vmg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220303030349.drd7mmwtufl45p3u@apollo.legion>
On Wed, Mar 2, 2022 at 7:03 PM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
>
> I think current approach is also not safe if cgroup_id gets reused, right? I.e.
> it only does cgroup_get_from_id in seq_start, not at attach time, so it may not
> be the same cgroup when calling read(2). kernfs is using idr_alloc_cyclic, so it
> is less likely to occur, but since it wraps around to find a free ID it might
> not be theoretical.
cgroupid is 64-bit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-03 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-25 23:43 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/9] Extend cgroup interface with bpf Hao Luo
2022-02-25 23:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/9] bpf: Add mkdir, rmdir, unlink syscalls for prog_bpf_syscall Hao Luo
2022-02-27 5:18 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-02-28 22:10 ` Hao Luo
2022-03-02 19:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-03 18:50 ` Hao Luo
2022-03-04 18:37 ` Hao Luo
2022-03-05 23:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-08 21:08 ` Hao Luo
2022-03-02 20:55 ` Yonghong Song
2022-03-03 18:56 ` Hao Luo
2022-03-03 19:13 ` Yonghong Song
2022-03-03 19:15 ` Hao Luo
2022-03-12 3:46 ` Al Viro
2022-03-14 17:07 ` Hao Luo
2022-03-14 23:10 ` Al Viro
2022-03-15 17:27 ` Hao Luo
2022-03-15 18:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-15 19:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-15 19:00 ` Al Viro
2022-03-15 19:47 ` Hao Luo
2022-02-25 23:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/9] bpf: Add BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET in the bpf_sys_bpf helper Hao Luo
2022-02-25 23:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/9] selftests/bpf: tests mkdir, rmdir, unlink and pin in syscall Hao Luo
2022-02-25 23:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/9] bpf: Introduce sleepable tracepoints Hao Luo
2022-03-02 19:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-03 19:37 ` Hao Luo
2022-03-03 19:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-02 21:23 ` Yonghong Song
2022-03-02 21:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-03 1:08 ` Yonghong Song
2022-03-03 2:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-03 19:43 ` Hao Luo
2022-03-03 20:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-03 20:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-03 22:06 ` Hao Luo
2022-02-25 23:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/9] cgroup: Sleepable cgroup tracepoints Hao Luo
2022-02-25 23:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/9] libbpf: Add sleepable tp_btf Hao Luo
2022-02-25 23:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/9] bpf: Lift permission check in __sys_bpf when called from kernel Hao Luo
2022-03-02 20:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-03-03 19:14 ` Hao Luo
2022-02-25 23:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/9] bpf: Introduce cgroup iter Hao Luo
2022-02-26 2:32 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-26 2:32 ` kernel test robot
2022-02-26 2:53 ` kernel test robot
2022-03-02 21:59 ` Yonghong Song
2022-03-03 20:02 ` Hao Luo
2022-03-02 22:45 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-03 2:03 ` Yonghong Song
2022-03-03 3:03 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-03 4:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2022-03-03 7:33 ` Yonghong Song
2022-03-03 8:13 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-03-03 21:52 ` Hao Luo
2022-02-25 23:43 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 9/9] selftests/bpf: Tests using sleepable tracepoints to monitor cgroup events Hao Luo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAADnVQJvbgq3j5SUb3OCbkndgpqeYNAv4Xgo2gOav0mC2f=vmg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jevburton.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).