From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03124C4646D for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 17:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE5C22428 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 17:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="nAwjnDgK" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9FE5C22428 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728396AbeHJUWc (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:22:32 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:33625 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728142AbeHJUWc (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Aug 2018 16:22:32 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id r24-v6so2076067wmh.0; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:51:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kPSVhjfaOxOd+GxbIJMoV0BYyps/tceCOxFgDKuLtbI=; b=nAwjnDgKJogxei4HaELzKQHeXP/BV87J0pK1KQHEVg0cCda1rsIisGECzv5ynwFaFb eeC4Es9ZJbTNwwaBmH6Aci2YTsfZahv7pYWaUsMLVGNBW5kzOnZ0mWmv/ZjtL7lY4+6m gD9haKtr4d+Xx1OXdxs6n7nsYJpbbJEOulOQ0pMSSn+pYycZebBamLUGcvop5Jv4Hh2M fPVe6Oabz76auxv9tNSEGViX7uMOWNlO2yN99oEhSx788X/r+ayW/fPbEq0kHnaflmWk xTU9rTRoXVNs2iUF91ml5rJiibs5pB9KUY3AyjxV1tYsGhQkTHQ3i6UCHhflu/r8TjbT //gQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kPSVhjfaOxOd+GxbIJMoV0BYyps/tceCOxFgDKuLtbI=; b=iMuZKnGigexVQCrbqAB4FB/lE+DeSGhzRUgsAb13coZTWMRMs7k9Ct5lBaXU4R+Qpp L1sRaqqpr6zNWdiJaNrudPeBFgt7qCSmn3KSQncUocM7z3YWuQQCNsy8zgwy0/gCnghz DhWVgCXQjzWOu2QQLRGekbjCjYSvYILEOGgOsEF5Hu3pbNon13MGekDIMLFdfVXG53t7 dejJSeZRtcMQe4fySgoSmoyXhBEnZ+hAXfFkA9n3JY8iQWBfgbhVwZeL6vmvbQgHbk+m VPmIJWEwjVMk1Sp03hMDaNwW0AKNVGR8LCDEYpk4rtd+yRiFluytmkfWf4PYCWfjBjW4 u1sw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGZGkXkkY5/uf4dskVYC46/3MM8Ow9Zg+cs30ZUDZ4F23n4PXLx 5EF4JFvhHw0B8lwGY+5HZAdmospRleLA9wgYZFY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPxs8UVigLbD2EOvTcVzPxM++OJq+Z9QpCPjzlZbrqE9ED9usTsYEafUTnTQoJAhsDaMr8IyJT14iDJZ7q70iXY= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:adca:: with SMTP id w193-v6mr1988696wme.147.1533923500115; Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:51:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180809052328.27942-1-me@tobin.cc> <20180809060734.rtqqu4sexbwzuqmm@ast-mbp> <20180809072753.GF32374@eros> <80bdc251-9f57-602f-6536-b34651684bb7@iogearbox.net> <20180810014636.GJ32374@eros> <20180810065752.2ab5473d@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20180810065752.2ab5473d@lwn.net> From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 10:51:28 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] Convert filter.txt to RST To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: "Tobin C. Harding" , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , "David S. Miller" , Kees Cook , Andy Lutomirski , Will Drewry , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Network Development , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 5:57 AM Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > The objective actually is to have SPDX tags in all files in the kernel. > That includes documentation, even though people, as always, care less > about the docs than they do the code. right, but let's do that as a separate patch set. In the current set I'd focus on reviewing the actual doc changes. In particular completely removing Documentation/networking/filter.txt feels wrong, since lots of websites point directly there. Can we have at least few words there pointing to new location?