From: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>
To: Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] soc: mediatek: add mtk-devapc driver
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 07:21:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAOTY_8T=DCntU8x5YEo+Pcs2J0Y4YvDaHUBdGiqEFRxghOd_Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1595303971-8793-3-git-send-email-neal.liu@mediatek.com>
Hi, Neal:
Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com> 於 2020年7月21日 週二 下午12:00寫道:
>
> MediaTek bus fabric provides TrustZone security support and data
> protection to prevent slaves from being accessed by unexpected
> masters.
> The security violation is logged and sent to the processor for
> further analysis or countermeasures.
>
> Any occurrence of security violation would raise an interrupt, and
> it will be handled by mtk-devapc driver. The violation
> information is printed in order to find the murderer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>
> ---
[snip]
> +
> +static u32 get_shift_group(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx, u32 vio_idx)
vio_idx is useless, so remove it.
> +{
> + u32 vio_shift_sta;
> + void __iomem *reg;
> +
> + reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_shift_sta;
> + vio_shift_sta = readl(reg);
> +
> + if (vio_shift_sta)
> + return __ffs(vio_shift_sta);
> +
> + return 31;
> +}
> +
[snip]
> +
> +/*
> + * mtk_devapc_dump_vio_dbg - get the violation index and dump the full violation
> + * debug information.
> + */
> +static bool mtk_devapc_dump_vio_dbg(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx, u32 vio_idx)
> +{
> + u32 shift_bit;
> +
> + if (check_vio_mask(ctx, vio_idx))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (!check_vio_status(ctx, vio_idx))
> + return false;
> +
> + shift_bit = get_shift_group(ctx, vio_idx);
> +
> + if (sync_vio_dbg(ctx, shift_bit))
> + return false;
> +
> + devapc_extract_vio_dbg(ctx);
I think get_shift_group(), sync_vio_dbg(), and
devapc_extract_vio_dbg() should be moved out of vio_idx for-loop (the
loop in devapc_violation_irq()) because these three function is not
related to vio_idx.
Another question: when multiple vio_idx violation occur, vio_addr is
related to which one vio_idx? The latest happened one?
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * devapc_violation_irq - the devapc Interrupt Service Routine (ISR) will dump
> + * violation information including which master violates
> + * access slave.
> + */
> +static irqreturn_t devapc_violation_irq(int irq_number,
> + struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
> +{
> + u32 vio_idx;
> +
> + for (vio_idx = 0; vio_idx < ctx->vio_idx_num; vio_idx++) {
> + if (!mtk_devapc_dump_vio_dbg(ctx, vio_idx))
> + continue;
> +
> + /* Ensure that violation info are written before
> + * further operations
> + */
> + smp_mb();
> +
> + /*
> + * Mask slave's irq before clearing vio status.
> + * Must do it to avoid nested interrupt and prevent
> + * unexpected behavior.
> + */
> + mask_module_irq(ctx, vio_idx, true);
> +
> + clear_vio_status(ctx, vio_idx);
> +
> + mask_module_irq(ctx, vio_idx, false);
> + }
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * start_devapc - initialize devapc status and start receiving interrupt
> + * while devapc violation is triggered.
> + */
> +static int start_devapc(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
> +{
> + void __iomem *pd_vio_shift_sta_reg;
> + void __iomem *pd_apc_con_reg;
> + u32 vio_shift_sta;
> + u32 vio_idx;
> +
> + pd_apc_con_reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->apc_con;
> + pd_vio_shift_sta_reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_shift_sta;
> + if (!pd_apc_con_reg || !pd_vio_shift_sta_reg)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Clear devapc violation status */
> + writel(BIT(31), pd_apc_con_reg);
> +
> + /* Clear violation shift status */
> + vio_shift_sta = readl(pd_vio_shift_sta_reg);
> + if (vio_shift_sta)
> + writel(vio_shift_sta, pd_vio_shift_sta_reg);
> +
> + /* Clear slave violation status */
> + for (vio_idx = 0; vio_idx < ctx->vio_idx_num; vio_idx++) {
> + clear_vio_status(ctx, vio_idx);
> + mask_module_irq(ctx, vio_idx, false);
> + }
> +
Why do you clear these? After power on hardware, I think these
register status are correct. If the default value of these register
are not correct, add a comment for this.
Regards,
Chun-Kuang.
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-21 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-21 3:59 [PATCH v3] Add MediaTek MT6779 devapc driver Neal Liu
2020-07-21 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: devapc: add bindings for mtk-devapc Neal Liu
2020-07-21 3:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] soc: mediatek: add mtk-devapc driver Neal Liu
2020-07-21 23:21 ` Chun-Kuang Hu [this message]
2020-07-22 3:49 ` Neal Liu
2020-07-22 14:25 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-07-23 6:11 ` Neal Liu
2020-07-23 16:32 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-07-24 6:55 ` Neal Liu
2020-07-24 15:55 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-07-27 3:05 ` Neal Liu
2020-07-27 14:47 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-07-28 3:52 ` Neal Liu
2020-07-28 15:35 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-07-29 2:10 ` Neal Liu
2020-07-29 2:22 ` Chun-Kuang Hu
2020-07-29 3:15 ` Neal Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAOTY_8T=DCntU8x5YEo+Pcs2J0Y4YvDaHUBdGiqEFRxghOd_Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=neal.liu@mediatek.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).