From: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
To: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
shuah@kernel.org, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, svaidy@linux.ibm.com,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, pratik.r.sampat@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/2] CPU-Idle latency selftest framework
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 22:23:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAYoRsWaAmyuJU4FCb7gtK0y-ZprdDVvp0vMpy=ZohzoC7YX1Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210404083354.23060-1-psampat@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Pratik,
I tried V3 on a Intel i5-10600K processor with 6 cores and 12 CPUs.
The core to cpu mappings are:
core 0 has cpus 0 and 6
core 1 has cpus 1 and 7
core 2 has cpus 2 and 8
core 3 has cpus 3 and 9
core 4 has cpus 4 and 10
core 5 has cpus 5 and 11
By default, it will test CPUs 0,2,4,6,10 on cores 0,2,4,0,2,4.
wouldn't it make more sense to test each core once?
With the source CPU always 0, I think the results from the results
from the destination CPUs 0 and 6, on core 0 bias the results, at
least in the deeper idle states. They don't make much difference in
the shallow states. Myself, I wouldn't include them in the results.
Example, where I used the -v option for all CPUs:
--IPI Latency Test---
--Baseline IPI Latency measurement: CPU Busy--
SRC_CPU DEST_CPU IPI_Latency(ns)
0 0 101
0 1 790
0 2 609
0 3 595
0 4 737
0 5 759
0 6 780
0 7 741
0 8 574
0 9 681
0 10 527
0 11 552
Baseline Avg IPI latency(ns): 620 <<<< suggest 656 here
---Enabling state: 0---
SRC_CPU DEST_CPU IPI_Latency(ns)
0 0 76
0 1 471
0 2 420
0 3 462
0 4 454
0 5 468
0 6 453
0 7 473
0 8 380
0 9 483
0 10 492
0 11 454
Expected IPI latency(ns): 0
Observed Avg IPI latency(ns) - State 0: 423 <<<<< suggest 456 here
---Enabling state: 1---
SRC_CPU DEST_CPU IPI_Latency(ns)
0 0 112
0 1 866
0 2 663
0 3 851
0 4 1090
0 5 1314
0 6 1941
0 7 1458
0 8 687
0 9 802
0 10 1041
0 11 1284
Expected IPI latency(ns): 1000
Observed Avg IPI latency(ns) - State 1: 1009 <<<< suggest 1006 here
---Enabling state: 2---
SRC_CPU DEST_CPU IPI_Latency(ns)
0 0 75
0 1 16362
0 2 16785
0 3 19650
0 4 17356
0 5 17606
0 6 2217
0 7 17958
0 8 17332
0 9 16615
0 10 17382
0 11 17423
Expected IPI latency(ns): 120000
Observed Avg IPI latency(ns) - State 2: 14730 <<<< suggest 17447 here
---Enabling state: 3---
SRC_CPU DEST_CPU IPI_Latency(ns)
0 0 103
0 1 17416
0 2 17961
0 3 16651
0 4 17867
0 5 17726
0 6 2178
0 7 16620
0 8 20951
0 9 16567
0 10 17131
0 11 17563
Expected IPI latency(ns): 1034000
Observed Avg IPI latency(ns) - State 3: 14894 <<<< suggest 17645 here
Hope this helps.
... Doug
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-09 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-04 8:33 [RFC v3 0/2] CPU-Idle latency selftest framework Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2021-04-04 8:33 ` [RFC v3 1/2] cpuidle: Extract IPI based and timer based wakeup latency from idle states Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2021-04-04 8:33 ` [RFC v3 2/2] selftest/cpuidle: Add support for cpuidle latency measurement Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2021-04-09 5:23 ` Doug Smythies [this message]
2021-04-09 7:43 ` [RFC v3 0/2] CPU-Idle latency selftest framework Pratik Sampat
2021-04-09 14:26 ` Doug Smythies
2023-09-11 5:36 Aboorva Devarajan
2023-09-25 5:06 ` Aboorva Devarajan
2023-10-12 4:48 ` Aboorva Devarajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAYoRsWaAmyuJU4FCb7gtK0y-ZprdDVvp0vMpy=ZohzoC7YX1Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pratik.r.sampat@gmail.com \
--cc=psampat@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=svaidy@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).