Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] arm: omap: remove ocp2scp_usb_phy_ick clock node

["ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@ti.com>]

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@ti.com> wrote:
> On 6/1/2012 2:52 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
>>
>> Hi Benoit,
>>
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson@ti.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5/30/2012 4:51 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I<kishon@ti.com>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "ocp2scp_usb_phy_ick" clock node was a fake clock node created
>>>>> to control MODULEMODE of ocp2scp. Since the hwmod for ocp2scp is now
>>>>> added
>>>>> (which can be used to control MODULEMODE) this clock node is removed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I<kishon@ti.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c |   11 -----------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Have you patched clock44xx_data.c manually or you have a patch for
>>>> the clock_data autogen script to generate it ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have a series that will remove all these clock nodes. I should be able
>>> to
>>> post that soon.
>>>
>>> Potentially at that time, Kishon might be able to drop that patch.
>>
>>
>> Will you be sending a patch for *[RFC PATCH 1/5] arm: omap: hwmod:
>> make *phy_48m* as the main_clk of ocp2scp* also or I have to keep that
>> as part of my series?
>
>
> Good point. In fact, I'm fixing both at the same time to avoid any bisect
> issue.

Thanks :-)

-Kishon