From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5123DC43334 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AE22064D for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 13:37:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="XYtxpOEO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 07AE22064D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729710AbeIFSNT (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2018 14:13:19 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f68.google.com ([209.85.167.68]:38984 "EHLO mail-lf1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727708AbeIFSNT (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Sep 2018 14:13:19 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f68.google.com with SMTP id v77-v6so9095438lfa.6; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 06:37:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jVPvpo3u/AdFOxsuq8hcRZoaMoN/vBXGtwVmkoZ9cVU=; b=XYtxpOEOjHvXOR3iRObzpt9oTLEfyn7Hom/1zS36Tk4BMmw+FaLZWyEy4tk3tw5phH p4BTAlQGEmM44x3SXvXRiViKMO7oHOShSHjWfAlfApG2JVRHR0MzKJXtnEpx36EUvc5E 0UNOoIfI3d9Rz2/MnWzAteODGOp8LxW0Py3zULMrB4HASR2UDRxfcRgCXplMG8f1pNQ5 iK9fShaxZouq+UQRdwJcrjaHwgzTfQNnqW23WLElVvTopr1dj2dsmV5W0qq8ypPzyxFH YyzpGEtx9czbv48WWPR++QZ0ycHNtDTC8T7xuJo/Ek+AjloOnlwfeBHSXlaxUu1BhCdc auaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jVPvpo3u/AdFOxsuq8hcRZoaMoN/vBXGtwVmkoZ9cVU=; b=Q3kKOSfn+Ci1oiip3duwMEfVrCW1GELabQgQ4d3kEzbNNK8ZI35R//o/AT6W8Wmtce wchhWSjUfUxTUypPYEb2mHnG0joOzK7CzAA5q6BqIUbgUEpVszMa7oIn3/pAQ8Wris82 HccRW5i8iRhOE89DO4K25BnDTjQZEI6KDbV9fCaCkzeJjWPsc5TcYGLKCGhuIj0PP/HR HtI5CvVpnX9dyiNxtdRqmNk0O2PUbxX/CGQm0Jmm9rVEbo+UvkbT2XFBZYwIDudjp3ql BH6Egd0+ufJw2CzhjPstExf28eQOzx4S5GsbTJ8Xz2MGesubLvBHZLQE6UPrL55xjc2S G2YA== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AekHtxVHADUZP9URwI27kWiCykvaaCmKUieFbIdgEaTUSerkxP XtI4bsO6htgpDYBUMpCZDuq/RpPEA1S3tXmdRmE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdbq34rULhA+zVrsGJ6cf1gdUufWGXJQ6N/ppHT+5L66CRYwBlJ+tUBvz3Feil34bqm/i4h3OoBvPnVdFzSFRqQ= X-Received: by 2002:a19:c38b:: with SMTP id t133-v6mr2109798lff.7.1536241062239; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 06:37:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180817070105.1725-1-simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com> <20180904194944.19721-1-simon.k.r.goldschmidt@gmail.com> <20180906110926.GF5360@sirena.org.uk> <20180906132333.GG5360@sirena.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20180906132333.GG5360@sirena.org.uk> From: Simon Goldschmidt Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 15:37:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] spi: dw: support 4-16 bits per word To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , Trent Piepho Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 3:23 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 01:23:34PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Please don't send new patches in reply to old patch serieses, it makes > > > it harder to follow what the current version of things is and makes it > > > much easier for the patches to get lost in the old threads. > > > Ok, no problem and thanks for the hint! Where does this requirement > > come from? Patchwork or mail sorting habits? > > Mail sorting. It can mean that you get things like someone deleting a > thread and the new patch getting caught up in a thread delete command > and hence missed. > > > Anyway, how does this continue, will you pick the patch or do I need > > to somehow collect yet more reviews? > > You should've got a mail at about the same time saying it's been > applied. Right, got it. Thanks again.