From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6621C2BD09 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 17:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E1C2464D for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 17:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=brainfault-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@brainfault-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="ZyBCIqvH" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730085AbfLERFa (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2019 12:05:30 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:44763 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729883AbfLERF1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2019 12:05:27 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id q10so4498908wrm.11 for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 09:05:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brainfault-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nmiicMy/6M+nsAYismUP6xCcu8kfa7/13Wnrua1z9JQ=; b=ZyBCIqvHD5Fw3/s1GossAdaOw/98K3zrqYDElXCxBpi4/Iv68AoRrJRRnG7HyBO2lW MTWiDEDoFmNklk1lP/I5zIT6bEjood7Bk+G0PlzfzSVPTNkDyuKZxFXBXoxqiYqXtbBr 2njrE6Br/bHNIpleZjeD41c48Wm/O7MQnua5TsIuspIVxVOJEACbpVFEepSRH8YvuISi 8/My4nIfSwAGy0BA7RKcgkkpY7cX6cjhLrLT/7QaEa1MstVIUgtC/c+kB1rVjMElb3iI D5D+CWD+R+Qe3qia42mRY8QSLu3uqYi/9SjS7DioUpOb0d/eyoulcNdrtTv22qmVb+oh o3hg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nmiicMy/6M+nsAYismUP6xCcu8kfa7/13Wnrua1z9JQ=; b=h0c5PnF4HlyFTpSrAvamUSy5NlJVa67MlMd9Ko28sWPfcXwxvr29WvuzJ2ulWyzCPK +VGzQnypHAO6ja42r0qNWymmbfztjACV2QZa8ZAtAahH56WzK9zFXGEK45kafZNA4l7V xuaMY3EaQM2K+l/++F+iYgRCPBty+gyXqVzE3evng4mZ+nmajCXsugHy1g/+HJXy5baI XUNJl0Y86AJo7SA5aMA0Hpyo3CWZKApMsQA0hOPvE+0wRJvzIHDbtBhfyrJ9+pX8EE1t x9bKcqfyjscgZ6fC3hrm/B51wUOOEyQRxW+TjIZxrPUF2+2wABFNWXSZ20pmhxap3qx2 3jcA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXfPp05btGU8XfiAVOex26rhLQHtZ0dypBPJsBOgkXIRrKvrhRu 3HU07o47trrx/CKJ/ja4cAGoTrOTrae3ZepT7fCEnMS39qQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw4k4hAJNrFCSqp5tAxbLz6JAprMFbTtuiQEa4hm28f/i05PdxA4aj5EH1iDs22iFZgxPNrT87oVQSx5niAtW8= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4752:: with SMTP id o18mr10964514wrs.330.1575565524767; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 09:05:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191205005601.1559-1-anup.patel@wdc.com> In-Reply-To: From: Anup Patel Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 22:35:13 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add debug defconfigs To: Paul Walmsley Cc: Anup Patel , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Atish Patra , Alistair Francis , Christoph Hellwig , "linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 10:31 PM Paul Walmsley wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, Anup Patel wrote: > > > I understand that you need DEBUG options for SiFive internal > > use > > [ ... ] > > > This is the right time to introduce debug defconfigs so that you can > > use it for your SiFive internal use > > [ ... ] > > > and you can find an alternative way to enable DEBUG options for SiFive > > internal use. > > What leads you to conclude that this was done for SiFive internal use? Why else you need it ? It is not at all a standard practice to put DEBUG options in defconfigs across architectures. Regards, Anup