From: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/numa: Set numa_node for all possible cpus
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 17:15:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAmzW4ME_WLYZPCt4+82RNKstv-H=LK5MKGGJR=6ha-ALS+FSw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06be5908-9af6-2892-0333-e9558b2cf474@suse.cz>
2020년 3월 13일 (금) 오후 8:38, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>님이 작성:
>
> On 3/13/20 12:04 PM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> >> I lost all the memory about it. :)
> >> Anyway, how about this?
> >>
> >> 1. make node_present_pages() safer
> >> static inline node_present_pages(nid)
> >> {
> >> if (!node_online(nid)) return 0;
> >> return (NODE_DATA(nid)->node_present_pages);
> >> }
> >>
> >
> > Yes this would help.
>
> Looks good, yeah.
>
> >> 2. make node_to_mem_node() safer for all cases
> >> In ppc arch's mem_topology_setup(void)
> >> for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> >> numa_setup_cpu(cpu);
> >> mem_node = node_to_mem_node(numa_mem_id());
> >> if (!node_present_pages(mem_node)) {
> >> _node_numa_mem_[numa_mem_id()] = first_online_node;
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >
> > But here as discussed above, we miss the case of possible but not present nodes.
> > For such nodes, the above change may not update, resulting in they still
> > having 0. And node 0 can be only possible but not present.
Oops, I don't read full thread so miss the case.
> So is there other way to do the setup so that node_to_mem_node() returns an
> online+present node when called for any possible node?
Two changes seems to be sufficient.
1. initialize all node's _node_numa_mem_[] = first_online_node in
mem_topology_setup()
2. replace the node with online+present node for _node_to_mem_node_[]
in set_cpu_numa_mem().
static inline void set_cpu_numa_mem(int cpu, int node)
{
per_cpu(_numa_mem_, cpu) = node;
+ if (!node_present_pages(node))
+ node = first_online_node;
_node_numa_mem_[cpu_to_node(cpu)] = node;
}
#endif
With these two change, we can safely call node_to_mem_node() anywhere.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-16 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-11 11:02 [PATCH 0/3] Offline memoryless cpuless node 0 Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/numa: Set numa_node for all possible cpus Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-11 11:57 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-12 5:27 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-12 8:23 ` Sachin Sant
2020-03-12 9:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-12 13:14 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-12 13:51 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-12 16:13 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-12 16:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-13 9:47 ` Joonsoo Kim
2020-03-13 11:04 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-13 11:38 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-16 8:15 ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]
2020-03-13 11:22 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-16 9:06 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-17 13:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-03-17 14:01 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/numa: Prefer node id queried from vphn Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-11 11:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/page_alloc: Keep memoryless cpuless node 0 offline Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-15 14:20 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-03-16 8:54 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-18 7:50 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2020-03-18 18:57 ` Christopher Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAAmzW4ME_WLYZPCt4+82RNKstv-H=LK5MKGGJR=6ha-ALS+FSw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).