linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: JoonSoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, devel@openvz.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 15/16] memcg/sl[au]b: shrink dead caches
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:48:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAmzW4NyK6gqqXHttUE35=-=h0Eve-smiYJCj3i+mHFFysQE4A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347977530-29755-16-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>

Hi Glauber.

2012/9/18 Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>:
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 0b68d15..9d79216 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2602,6 +2602,7 @@ redo:
>         } else
>                 __slab_free(s, page, x, addr);
>
> +       kmem_cache_verify_dead(s);
>  }

As far as u know, I am not a expert and don't know anything about memcg.
IMHO, this implementation may hurt system performance in some case.

In case of memcg is destoried, remained kmem_cache is marked "dead".
After it is marked,
every free operation to this "dead" kmem_cache call
kmem_cache_verify_dead() and finally call kmem_cache_shrink().
kmem_cache_shrink() do invoking kmalloc and flush_all() and taking a
lock for online node and invoking kfree.
Especially, flush_all() may hurt performance largely, because it call
has_cpu_slab() against all the cpus.

And I know some other case it can hurt system performance.
But, I don't mention it, because above case is sufficient to worry.

And, I found one case that destroying memcg's kmem_cache don't works properly.
If we destroy memcg after all object is freed, current implementation
doesn't destroy kmem_cache.
kmem_cache_destroy_work_func() check "cachep->memcg_params.nr_pages == 0",
but in this case, it return false, because kmem_cache may have
cpu_slab, and cpu_partials_slabs.
As we already free all objects, kmem_cache_verify_dead() is not invoked forever.
I think that we need another kmem_cache_shrink() in
kmem_cache_destroy_work_func().

I don't convince that I am right, so think carefully my humble opinion.

Thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-21  4:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-18 14:11 [PATCH v3 00/16] slab accounting for memcg Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] slab/slub: struct memcg_params Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] slub: use free_page instead of put_page for freeing kmalloc allocation Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] slab: Ignore the cflgs bit in cache creation Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 15:20   ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-21 17:33   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-18 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] provide a common place for initcall processing in kmem_cache Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 15:22   ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-18 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] consider a memcg parameter in kmem_create_cache Glauber Costa
2012-09-21 18:14   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-24  8:12     ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-24 12:41       ` Christoph
2012-09-24 12:41         ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-24 13:42           ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-24 13:44             ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-24 13:56               ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-24 13:57                 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-24 15:38                   ` Pekka Enberg
2012-09-24 15:36                     ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-24 17:38                       ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-24 17:39                     ` Christoph Lameter
2012-10-02 14:46   ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-18 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] memcg: infrastructure to match an allocation to the right cache Glauber Costa
2012-09-21 18:32   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-24  8:46     ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-24 17:56       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-25 13:57         ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-25 16:28           ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-21 20:52   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-24  8:17     ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-24 17:58       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-18 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] memcg: skip memcg kmem allocations in specified code regions Glauber Costa
2012-09-21 19:59   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-24  9:09     ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-24 17:47       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-18 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] slab: allow enable_cpu_cache to use preset values for its tunables Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 15:25   ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-19  7:44     ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-21  9:29   ` Pekka Enberg
2012-09-18 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] sl[au]b: always get the cache from its page in kfree Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 15:28   ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-19  7:42     ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-19 14:14       ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-21  9:33       ` Pekka Enberg
2012-09-21  9:30         ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-21  9:41           ` Pekka Enberg
2012-09-21 20:07             ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-21 20:14               ` Pekka Enberg
2012-09-21 20:16                 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-18 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] sl[au]b: Allocate objects from memcg cache Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] memcg: destroy memcg caches Glauber Costa
2012-09-21 20:22   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-18 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] memcg/sl[au]b Track all the memcg children of a kmem_cache Glauber Costa
2012-09-21 20:31   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-18 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] slab: slab-specific propagation changes Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 17:00   ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-19  7:41     ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] slub: slub-specific " Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] memcg/sl[au]b: shrink dead caches Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 17:02   ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-19  7:40     ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-21  4:48   ` JoonSoo Kim [this message]
2012-09-21  8:40     ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-21  9:28       ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-09-21  9:31         ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-21 20:40   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-24  8:25     ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-24 17:43       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-18 14:12 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] Add documentation about the kmem controller Glauber Costa
2012-09-21  9:40 ` [PATCH v3 00/16] slab accounting for memcg Pekka Enberg
2012-09-21  9:43   ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-21 20:46 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-21 20:47   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-24  8:15   ` Glauber Costa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAmzW4NyK6gqqXHttUE35=-=h0Eve-smiYJCj3i+mHFFysQE4A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=glommer@parallels.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=suleiman@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).