From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757683Ab2IGVKW (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:10:22 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:47910 "EHLO mail-ob0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756878Ab2IGVKH (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:10:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120907125519.GB11266@suse.de> References: <1346779479-1097-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <1346779479-1097-2-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de> <20120907125519.GB11266@suse.de> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 06:10:06 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] slab: do ClearSlabPfmemalloc() for all pages of slab From: JoonSoo Kim To: Mel Gorman Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux-MM , Linux-Netdev , LKML , David Miller , Chuck Lever , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Christoph Lameter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2012/9/7 Mel Gorman : > This churns code a lot more than is necessary. How about this as a > replacement patch? > > ---8<--- > From: Joonsoo Kim > Subject: [PATCH] slab: do ClearSlabPfmemalloc() for all pages of slab > > Right now, we call ClearSlabPfmemalloc() for first page of slab when we > clear SlabPfmemalloc flag. This is fine for most swap-over-network use > cases as it is expected that order-0 pages are in use. Unfortunately it > is possible that that __ac_put_obj() checks SlabPfmemalloc on a tail page > and while this is harmless, it is sloppy. This patch ensures that the head > page is always used. > > [mgorman@suse.de: Easier implementation, changelog cleanup] > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman > --- > mm/slab.c | 12 +++++------- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c > index 811af03..590d52a 100644 > --- a/mm/slab.c > +++ b/mm/slab.c > @@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static void *__ac_put_obj(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct array_cache *ac, > { > if (unlikely(pfmemalloc_active)) { > /* Some pfmemalloc slabs exist, check if this is one */ > - struct page *page = virt_to_page(objp); > + struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(objp); > if (PageSlabPfmemalloc(page)) > set_obj_pfmemalloc(&objp); > } > @@ -1919,12 +1919,10 @@ static void *kmem_getpages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags, int nodeid) > else > add_zone_page_state(page_zone(page), > NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE, nr_pages); > - for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) > __SetPageSlab(page + i); > - > - if (page->pfmemalloc) > - SetPageSlabPfmemalloc(page + i); > - } > + if (page->pfmemalloc) > + SetPageSlabPfmemalloc(page); > > if (kmemcheck_enabled && !(cachep->flags & SLAB_NOTRACK)) { > kmemcheck_alloc_shadow(page, cachep->gfporder, flags, nodeid); > @@ -1955,9 +1953,9 @@ static void kmem_freepages(struct kmem_cache *cachep, void *addr) > else > sub_zone_page_state(page_zone(page), > NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE, nr_freed); > + __ClearPageSlabPfmemalloc(page); > while (i--) { > BUG_ON(!PageSlab(page)); > - __ClearPageSlabPfmemalloc(page); > __ClearPageSlab(page); > page++; > } Okay.