From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753907AbcI1XmI (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2016 19:42:08 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f52.google.com ([209.85.213.52]:34536 "EHLO mail-vk0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751702AbcI1Xl7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2016 19:41:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160928182200.15800-6-atull@opensource.altera.com> References: <20160928182200.15800-1-atull@opensource.altera.com> <20160928182200.15800-6-atull@opensource.altera.com> From: Moritz Fischer Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:41:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 05/12] fpga-mgr: add fpga image information struct To: Alan Tull Cc: Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Mark Rutland , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ian Campbell , Jon Masters , Walter Goossens , Michal Simek , Cyril Chemparathy , Josh Cartwright , Matthew Gerlach , Dinh Nguyen , Devicetree List , linux-arm-kernel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alan Tull Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Alan, generally ok with the change. On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Alan Tull wrote: > -int fpga_mgr_buf_load(struct fpga_manager *mgr, u32 flags, const char *buf, > - size_t count) > +int fpga_mgr_buf_load(struct fpga_manager *mgr, struct fpga_image_info *info, > + const char *buf, size_t count) Doesn't this break the both socfpga and zynq if [6/12] and [7/12] are not part of this commit? i.e shouldn't 5,6 and 7 be a single commit? Cheers, Moritz