From: Daniel Noack <fsf.deathman@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Mmap on SSD (directly mapping the device vs. mapping a file)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:59:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAv8mH3kukd-ii04hQbMZGj7iTwQhpFDwFtnz0h3JBMe6gaGxA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi, folks!
First of all I have to say sorry that I'm not a subscriber of the list now,
but I will subscribe in the near future (need an extra email account for it
;) ). It would be nice if you could put me on CC for an answer to my
question.
Like you can see on the subject I experimented a little bit with mmap in the
last time. I've written a little B+tree library which uses mmap to store
the tree to a file or the whole device (means it is also possible to map
the hwole device (i.e. /dev/sdb)). I used msync after every successfull
change on the tree. Next thing I did was to use this for a little benchmark
on performance of different storage devices (ramdisk, HDD, and a very fast
flashcard directly atteched to the PCIe bus). I recognized that in allmost
all cases when directly mapping teh device without a filesystem the
file-mapped version was a little bit slower. But when I tried it on an SSD
device the file-mapped version was an order of magnitude faster. I also
tried secure erase and did the benchmarks many times and in many
configurations, but I came to the same results. Can anyone explain me
what's happening here or have I something missed. Is this behavior correct?
Thanks,
Daniel
next reply other threads:[~2012-08-14 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-14 10:59 Daniel Noack [this message]
2012-08-15 9:26 Mmap on SSD (directly mapping the device vs. mapping a file) Daniel Noack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAv8mH3kukd-ii04hQbMZGj7iTwQhpFDwFtnz0h3JBMe6gaGxA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=fsf.deathman@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).