From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1165895AbdEYWyt (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2017 18:54:49 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57890 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760337AbdEYWyZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2017 18:54:25 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 121B123A03 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=mcgrof@kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170525201439.GA20750@amd> References: <20170517165502.b6jqdcmkgz6iyau2@thunk.org> <20170517174128.GQ17314@wotan.suse.de> <20170518221205.gcfs2t4ihlpx5kj6@thunk.org> <20170518230442.GC8951@wotan.suse.de> <1495193510.7848.101.camel@linux.intel.com> <20170519150920.GF8951@wotan.suse.de> <20170519175912.GL8951@wotan.suse.de> <20170525170518.GC3085@amd> <20170525173131.GX8951@wotan.suse.de> <20170525201439.GA20750@amd> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 15:54:03 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [copyleft-next] Re: Kernel modules under new copyleft licence : (was Re: [PATCH v2] module.h: add copyleft-next >= 0.3.1 as GPL compatible) To: Pavel Machek Cc: Alan Cox , "Theodore Ts'o" , Linus Torvalds , AKASHI Takahiro , Greg KH , Rusty Russell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ciaran Farrell , Christopher De Nicolo , Richard Fontana , Discussion and development of copyleft-next , One Thousand Gnomes , Paul Bolle , Peter Anvin , Joe Perches , "Luis R. Rodriguez" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> > > So that yields: >> > > >> > > * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it >> > > * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free >> > > * Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or at your option) any >> > > * later version; or, when distributed separately from the Linux kernel or >> > > * incorporated into other software packages, subject to the >> > >> > You have more )s there than (s. >> >> Thanks just removed that pesky ) >> >> > Can you get rid of the "when distributed separately from the Linux >> > kernel or incorporated into other software packages," wording? I'm not >> > exactly sure what it is trying to say, and if it limits the license >> > below in any way. >> >> I had to pick an "or language" used already upstream and which folks were OK >> with, this was one and I went with it. I prefer it as it makes it clear the >> intent is outside of Linux I wish copyleft-next to apply. > > Yes, the intent is clear. What is not clear is if the intent is > legally binding. Code already is upstream (Xen) with this sort of or language. I think that's sufficient for me, unless of course you have something better to recommend. Luis