From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DFEC606CF for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504A72084B for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="cRN+1ygj" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727193AbfGJM2L (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:28:11 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-f67.google.com ([209.85.210.67]:33876 "EHLO mail-ot1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725929AbfGJM2K (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 08:28:10 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-f67.google.com with SMTP id n5so1947630otk.1; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 05:28:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9FNqx+M2R51JE04Z34tCRtE1I2zuoMlX/VVUP9urQ/g=; b=cRN+1ygji015bntIuNNMqDL5Hhvz9UEFPR3wPkgOd9pZ0sb8Pp6JS2cxZ/6Ck9aJZ6 slcqy2QAylFSWD4AZkxn5Bpfo9f3TuRqaNv1y8ffzX6ubNCA+Udge0FdoXinLWh+NVsS VCnGASm/tVS8oWXMoqO9ufoKto1DbMJGmEZfUyai1gHAVkJYHxZjBQq02gLm9aN4oZcL zuPGYJsuDgJO1+gJexcT2ymPZob4d6bKWcPLuIsqByOSS5+oq1iYO66/C7rE+oIKCYQ4 Oe+nVSxEfPTEuYVebEkSW4FfE2PGDL+uov5nucedyg1dhivtPIfCXoUyz9U+Yn8wbvzo ToUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9FNqx+M2R51JE04Z34tCRtE1I2zuoMlX/VVUP9urQ/g=; b=avJnukx/EgcaSkaV0kxOkES0PR2itp8wKNc96nl3XTQG8dUezggB+s3KdJLkivkLSj Ev4KLRdJ3Pc+p1Z4M56lcEfBJnEhmbYVwtXhcQYX2uyvg4ggbm8hbCriy75IBF+ERGP2 U7hdws6MBs/xB56XqyjwW4tJSYxN3z4ur4aQwo7uj28pLInTZ1JOeqyRV3xxrhlkfLr/ zcVgDd4HrtO4o/qdl9IBzAB3AKGoiLxpSsjWpkEpcY0yTkPOjn5cKuyWpXsOEK+nEqpC gS8NEjQ8QivvgDO6gfse2ni4TPI/RFgO733szeHnoj9PwNliM5qYOPUm/4eq/nExCF/1 2utA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXQ99plM7X3eSrrPbHvf+c9qfOjdELn2jOqn38FxM4yQLwX3APx qu0zWGLZ3TK3rh6Thq6URayJ+IyDzHzJl9aLh8E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzEWNBdZe9q7RPZCtKpqe0c0GbIay/OZ2Z1mJrHeMez83o2JTAzAdGZ3NJ3TfKDfeJ7z6jA9RE3ZCouyFwvx6s= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6194:: with SMTP id g20mr2471325otk.149.1562761689474; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 05:28:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190208150826.44EBC68DD2@newverein.lst.de> <0f8d2e77-7e51-fba8-b179-102318d9ff84@arm.com> <20190311114945.GA5625@lst.de> <20190408153628.GL6139@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> <20190409175238.GE9255@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20190409175238.GE9255@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> From: Ruslan Bilovol Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 15:27:58 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/5] arm64: ftrace with regs To: Will Deacon Cc: Mark Rutland , Torsten Duwe , Catalin Marinas , Steven Rostedt , Julien Thierry , Josh Poimboeuf , Ingo Molnar , Ard Biesheuvel , Arnd Bergmann , AKASHI Takahiro , Amit Daniel Kachhap , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:52 PM Will Deacon wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 04:36:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:49:46PM +0100, Torsten Duwe wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:11:04AM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote: > > > > Hi Torsten, > > > > > > > > On 08/02/2019 15:08, Torsten Duwe wrote: > > > > > Patch series v8, as discussed. > > > > > The whole series applies cleanly on 5.0-rc5 > > > > > > So what's the status now? Besides debatable minor style > > > issues there were no more objections to v8. Would this > > > go through the ARM repo or via the ftrace repo? > > > > Sorry agains for the delay on this. I'm now back in the office and in > > front of a computer daily, so I can spend a bit more time on this. > > > > Regardless of anything else, I think that we should queue the first > > three patches now. I've poked the relevant maintainers for their acks so > > that those can be taken via the arm64 tree. > > > > I'm happy to do the trivial cleanups on the last couple of patches (e.g. > > s/lr/x30), and I'm actively looking at the API rework I requested. > > Ok, I've picked up patches 1-3 and I'll wait for you to spin updates to the > last two. Ok, I see that patches 1-3 are picked up and are already present in recent kernels. Is there any progress on remaining two patches? Any help required? Thanks, Ruslan