linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] of: Add cpu node iterator for_each_of_cpu_node()
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 10:00:17 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABGGisw_bd+bJedZ_T2e-dxmRnXf2N_gGBZj8u+QVGQxj_gc+Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871s87jz3g.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 9:20 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
> Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes:
> > Hi Rob,
> >
> > Sorry I missed this when you posted it.
> >
> > Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> writes:
> >> Iterating thru cpu nodes is a common pattern. Create a common iterator
> >> which can find child nodes either by node name or device_type == cpu.
> >> Using the former will allow for eventually dropping device_type
> >> properties which are deprecated for FDT.
> >
> > Device trees we see on powerpc generally don't (never?) use "cpu" as the
> > node name for CPU nodes. And many of those device trees come from
> > firmware, so we can't update them.
> >
> > So dropping support for device_type is a non-starter from our POV.
>
> ps. presumably that's what you meant by deprecated *for FDT*.

Right.

> But anyway just wanted to make sure we are on the same page.

Yes, I was aware at least older powerpc DTs don't use 'cpu' for node names.

Rob

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-30 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-05 19:37 [PATCH 00/21] DT cpu node iterator Rob Herring
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 01/21] of: Add cpu node iterator for_each_of_cpu_node() Rob Herring
2018-09-06  8:45   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-30 14:18   ` Michael Ellerman
2018-10-30 14:20     ` Michael Ellerman
2018-10-30 15:00       ` Rob Herring [this message]
2018-11-01 10:52         ` Michael Ellerman
2018-11-01 15:12           ` Segher Boessenkool
2018-11-01 15:57             ` Rob Herring
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 02/21] of: Support matching cpu nodes with no 'reg' property Rob Herring
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 03/21] ARM: use for_each_of_cpu_node iterator Rob Herring
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 04/21] ARM: topology: remove unneeded check for /cpus node Rob Herring
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 05/21] ARM: shmobile: use for_each_of_cpu_node iterator Rob Herring
2018-09-06  8:52   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-09-06  8:56   ` Simon Horman
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 06/21] arm64: " Rob Herring
2018-09-06 10:04   ` Will Deacon
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 07/21] c6x: " Rob Herring
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 08/21] microblaze: get cpu node with of_get_cpu_node Rob Herring
2018-09-10 14:56   ` Michal Simek
2018-09-10 20:49     ` Rob Herring
2018-09-11 12:15       ` Michal Simek
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 09/21] nios2: " Rob Herring
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 10/21] openrisc: use for_each_of_cpu_node iterator Rob Herring
2018-09-06  9:12   ` Stafford Horne
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 11/21] powerpc: " Rob Herring
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 12/21] powerpc: 4xx: get cpu node with of_get_cpu_node Rob Herring
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 13/21] powerpc: 8xx: " Rob Herring
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 14/21] riscv: use for_each_of_cpu_node iterator Rob Herring
2018-09-10 13:37   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-09-10 13:51     ` Rob Herring
2018-09-18 22:53   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 15/21] SH: " Rob Herring
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 16/21] x86: DT: " Rob Herring
2018-09-06  8:15   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 17/21] clk: mvebu: " Rob Herring
2018-09-06  1:47   ` Stephen Boyd
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 18/21] edac: cpc925: " Rob Herring
2018-09-06  8:35   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-06 11:12     ` Rob Herring
2018-09-06 12:20       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 19/21] iommu: fsl_pamu: " Rob Herring
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 20/21] of: " Rob Herring
2018-10-31 12:46   ` NXP P50XX/e5500 secondary CPUs not onlined with current mainline (was [PATCH 20/21] of: use for_each_of_cpu_node iterator) Michael Ellerman
2018-10-31 14:25     ` Rob Herring
2018-11-01 10:55       ` Michael Ellerman
2018-09-05 19:37 ` [PATCH 21/21] fbdev: fsl-diu: get cpu node with of_get_cpu_node Rob Herring
2018-09-11  3:34   ` Timur Tabi
     [not found] ` <CAHTX3d+BFKM-jFo8Ww_dXwAzsDVoWqE==erfwVTeijHfh8kkOw@mail.gmail.com>
2018-09-07 13:58   ` [PATCH 00/21] DT cpu node iterator Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABGGisw_bd+bJedZ_T2e-dxmRnXf2N_gGBZj8u+QVGQxj_gc+Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).