linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Aditya Srivastava <yashsri421@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: improve handling of email comments
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 11:41:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABJPP5Ca8SNGmoE7GVc0OBotFhA6mLuX46QQETiVcQwTKHRosA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b9beccf81735f2e042447026a1043f8d21c2566.camel@perches.com>

On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 9:44 AM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-10-30 at 12:58 +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2020-10-30 at 14:37 +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:
> > > > checkpatch has limited support for parsing email comments. It only
> > > > support single name comments or single after address comments.
> > > > Whereas, RFC 5322 specifies that comments can be inserted in
> > > > between any tokens of the email fields.
> > > >
> > > > Improve comment parsing mechanism in checkpatch.
> > > >
> > > > What is handled now:
> > > >
> > > > - Multiple name/address comments
> > > > - Comments anywhere in between name/address
> > > > - Nested comments like (John (Doe))
> > > >
> > > > A brief analysis of checkpatch output on v5.0..v5.7 showed that
> > > > after these modifications, the number of BAD_SIGN_OFF warnings
> > > > came down from 2944 to 1424, and FROM_SIGN_OFF_MISMATCH came
> > > > down from 2366 to 2330.
> > > >
> > > > So, a total of 1556 false positives were resolved in total.
> > >
> > > A mere reduction in messages emitted isn't necessarily good.
> > >
> >
> > Agree. That is why I also went through the list of those warnings.
> >
> > I could not spot any obvious true positive among the reduced ones.
> >
> >
> > > Please send me privately a complete list of these nominally
> > > false positive messages that are no longer emitted.
> > >
> > > I believe one of the relatively common incorrect messages is
> > > for the cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> where a version number is
> > > continued on the same line after a #.
> > >
> > > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # for versions x.y.z and above
> > >
> >
> > That was one,
>
> It's not just one, it's ~90% of the list that Dwaipayan sent me.
>
> $ wc -l mismatches
> 831 mismatches
>
> $ grep -v -i stable mismatches | wc -l
> 98
>
> > another common pattern was just quotes put inconsistently at
> > different places.
>
> Yes, there are some defects there.
> But there are also now false negatives.
>
> For instance, this is not appropriate to ignore:
>
> WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: email address 'jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmurphy@ti.com' might be better as 'jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com,linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmurphy@ti.com'
>
> From the file that Dwaipayan sent me, all the rest not including the
> stable variants, which IMO should be handled separately, are below.
>
> Of these 98 in total, 60+% are unicode which IMO should always be quoted
> and most are doubled with BAD_SIGN_OFF doubling FROM_SIGN_OFF_MISMATCH
> (and I don't quite understand why it's "From:/" then "Signed-off-by:"
>
> $ grep -v -i stable dwai | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
>      31 WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: email address '周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>' might be better as '"周琰杰"(Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>'
>      30 WARNING:FROM_SIGN_OFF_MISMATCH: From:/Signed-off-by: email name mismatch: 'From: "周琰杰"(Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>' != 'Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>'
>
> These 29 in total would be better stripping any bits in parentheses from
> the name portion only when _not_ inside quotes.
>
>      20 WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: email address 'Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org>' might be better as '"Thomas Hellström"(VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org>'
>       5 WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: email address 'H. Peter Anvin (Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>' might be better as '"H. Peter Anvin"(Intel) <hpa@zytor.com>'
>
>
>       1 WARNING:FROM_SIGN_OFF_MISMATCH: From:/Signed-off-by: email name mismatch: 'From: "Thomas Hellström"(VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org>' != 'Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström (VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org>'
>
>       1 WARNING:FROM_SIGN_OFF_MISMATCH: From:/Signed-off-by: email name mismatch: 'From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat"(VMware) <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>' != 'Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>'
>       1 WARNING:FROM_SIGN_OFF_MISMATCH: From:/Signed-off-by: email name mismatch: 'From: JanNieuwenhuizen(janneke) <janneke@gnu.org>' != 'Signed-off-by: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>'
>       1 WARNING:FROM_SIGN_OFF_MISMATCH: From:/Signed-off-by: email name mismatch: 'From: "Frédéric Pierret"(fepitre) <frederic.pierret@qubes-os.org>' != 'Signed-off-by: Frédéric Pierret (fepitre) <frederic.pierret@qubes-os.org>'
>
> So these 8 others are ones where quotes are either oddly placed
> or perhaps should always exist and the comment in parentheses
> is suggested poorly.  7 of these should be fixed and one should
> still be reported.
>
>       1 WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: email address '"Thomas Hellström (VMware)" <thomas_os@shipmail.org>' might be better as '"Thomas Hellström"(VMware) <thomas_os@shipmail.org>'
>       1 WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: email address 'Srivatsa S. Bhat (VMware) <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>' might be better as '"Srivatsa S. Bhat"(VMware) <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>'
>       1 WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: email address '"Rantala, Tommi T. (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <tommi.t.rantala@nokia.com>' might be better as '"Rantala, Tommi T."(Nokia - FI/Espoo) <tommi.t.rantala@nokia.com>'
>       1 WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: email address '"Kai Mäkisara (Kolumbus)" <kai.makisara@kolumbus.fi>' might be better as '"Kai Mäkisara"(Kolumbus) <kai.makisara@kolumbus.fi>'
>       1 WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: email address 'jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmurphy@ti.com' might be better as 'jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com,linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmurphy@ti.com'
>       1 WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: email address 'Frédéric Pierret (fepitre) <frederic.pierret@qubes-os.org>' might be better as '"Frédéric Pierret"(fepitre) <frederic.pierret@qubes-os.org>'
>       1 WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: email address 'David.Laight@aculab.com (big endian system concerns)' might be better as 'David.Laight@aculab.com(big endian system concerns)'
>       1 WARNING:BAD_SIGN_OFF: email address 'apenwarr@foxnet.net (Avery Pennarun)' might be better as 'apenwarr@foxnet.net(Avery Pennarun)'
>
>
Hi,
Thanks for the review.

So I get that the parentheses from within quotes should not
be extracted. I will do that.

But for the names which should be quoted, I think the errors appeared
because of a parsing bug. There is no separate mechanism
to distinguish quoted and unquoted names currently.

Names which have must quote characters without any comments are
not warned about right now:

D. Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com> doesn't throw any warning, while
D. Ray (Dwai) <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com> does.

Do you think this should be dealt separately from this patch?
Perhaps as another warning?

Thanks,
Dwaipayan.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-31  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-30  9:07 [PATCH] checkpatch: improve handling of email comments Dwaipayan Ray
2020-10-30 11:54 ` Joe Perches
2020-10-30 11:58   ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-10-30 12:21     ` Joe Perches
2020-10-31  4:14     ` Joe Perches
2020-10-31  6:11       ` Dwaipayan Ray [this message]
2020-10-31 11:14         ` Joe Perches
2020-10-31 21:08           ` Dwaipayan Ray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABJPP5Ca8SNGmoE7GVc0OBotFhA6mLuX46QQETiVcQwTKHRosA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dwaipayanray1@gmail.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
    --cc=yashsri421@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).