From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753379Ab2A3UJU (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:09:20 -0500 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:49109 "EHLO mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753179Ab2A3UJT convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:09:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120130200432.GC5797@infradead.org> References: <20120113144731.GA5458@quad> <20120113165315.GA24387@infradead.org> <20120130190008.GA5797@infradead.org> <20120130200432.GC5797@infradead.org> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:09:17 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix broken perf inject -b From: Stephane Eranian To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, robert.richter@amd.com X-System-Of-Record: true Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:53:26PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu: >> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo >> wrote: >> > >> > Em Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 07:53:28PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu: >> > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote: >> > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> > > >> Em Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 03:47:31PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu: >> > > >>> perf inject -b was broken. It would not inject any build_ids >> > > >>> into the stream. Furthermore, it would strip samples from the >> > > >>> stream. >> > >> > > >>> @@ -173,6 +178,7 @@ static int perf_event__inject_buildid(struct perf_tool *tool, >> > > >>>               goto repipe; >> > > >>>       } >> > > >>> +     machine->pid = event->ip.pid; >> > >> > > I noticed that this statement conflicts with perf buildid-list (which >> > > I am also fixing for pipe mode). >> > >> > > I don't quite understand why, though. >> > >> > Have you reached any conclusion about this problem? I haven't looked at >> > it in detail, could you please elaborate more? >> > >> >> I ended up removing it. But I am not sure this is correct. >> Is the pid used in any way when processing buildids? > > I can't think of any. > > The same DSO could conceivably be present in the virtual machine, the > host, and in the workstation used for perf report.  We just use the > build-id in the perf.data file to find the right symtab. > Right, so I don't know why it's there...