From: Ivan Babrou <ivan@cloudflare.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Reclaim regression after 1c30844d2dfe
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 14:54:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABWYdi1eOUD1DHORJxTsWPMT3BcZhz++xP1pXhT=x4SgxtgQZA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
This change from 5.5 times:
* https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/1c30844d2dfe
> mm: reclaim small amounts of memory when an external fragmentation event occurs
Introduced undesired effects in our environment.
* NUMA with 2 x CPU
* 128GB of RAM
* THP disabled
* Upgraded from 4.19 to 5.4
Before we saw free memory hover at around 1.4GB with no spikes. After
the upgrade we saw some machines decide that they need a lot more than
that, with frequent spikes above 10GB, often only on a single numa
node.
We can see kswapd quite active in balance_pgdat (it didn't look like
it slept at all):
$ ps uax | fgrep kswapd
root 1850 23.0 0.0 0 0 ? R Jan30 1902:24 [kswapd0]
root 1851 1.8 0.0 0 0 ? S Jan30 152:16 [kswapd1]
This in turn massively increased pressure on page cache, which did not
go well to services that depend on having a quick response from a
local cache backed by solid storage.
Here's how it looked like when I zeroed vm.watermark_boost_factor:
* https://imgur.com/a/6IZWicU
IO subsided from 100% busy in page cache population at 300MB/s on a
single SATA drive down to under 100MB/s.
This sort of regression doesn't seem like a good thing.
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-07 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-07 22:54 Ivan Babrou [this message]
2020-02-07 23:05 ` Reclaim regression after 1c30844d2dfe Rik van Riel
2020-02-08 9:08 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-02-11 10:16 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-12 22:45 ` Ivan Babrou
2020-02-12 23:55 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-18 22:07 ` Ivan Babrou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CABWYdi1eOUD1DHORJxTsWPMT3BcZhz++xP1pXhT=x4SgxtgQZA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ivan@cloudflare.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).