From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752783AbdI3KiV (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2017 06:38:21 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com ([209.85.161.176]:53593 "EHLO mail-yw0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750933AbdI3KiU (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Sep 2017 06:38:20 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBwhI7obnhSMq+XfHBfZZ9ZCLLn0kARuloePae85ipfKW3NHFaWonAoMyPE75m6MaNFWtYJOPOIK2Uo49nV+A4= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170929235846.1913-1-dianders@chromium.org> References: <20170929235846.1913-1-dianders@chromium.org> From: Guenter Roeck Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 03:38:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: rockchip-typec: Check for errors from tcphy_phy_init() To: Douglas Anderson Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Guenter Roeck , Chris , wulf , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , linux-kernel , Heiko Stuebner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote: > The function tcphy_phy_init() could return an error but the callers > weren't checking the return value. They should. In at least one case > while testing I saw the message "wait pma ready timeout" which > indicates that tcphy_phy_init() really could return an error and we > should account for it. > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck > --- > > drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c | 13 +++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c > index 4d2c57f21d76..38831eebc934 100644 > --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c > +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-typec.c > @@ -685,8 +685,11 @@ static int rockchip_usb3_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy) > if (tcphy->mode == new_mode) > goto unlock_ret; > > - if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT) > - tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode); > + if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT) { > + ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode); > + if (ret) > + goto unlock_ret; > + } > > /* wait TCPHY for pipe ready */ > for (timeout = 0; timeout < 100; timeout++) { > @@ -760,10 +763,12 @@ static int rockchip_dp_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy) > */ > if (new_mode == MODE_DFP_DP && tcphy->mode != MODE_DISCONNECT) { > tcphy_phy_deinit(tcphy); > - tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode); > + ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode); > } else if (tcphy->mode == MODE_DISCONNECT) { > - tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode); > + ret = tcphy_phy_init(tcphy, new_mode); > } > + if (ret) > + goto unlock_ret; > > ret = readx_poll_timeout(readl, tcphy->base + DP_MODE_CTL, > val, val & DP_MODE_A2, 1000, > -- > 2.14.2.822.g60be5d43e6-goog >