linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 11:25:50 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABb+yY18Aye3wr2A9-+jemqc=VSRyUA+xzKGo9s0G4KCt1ovyA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170630095608.24943-2-andre.przywara@arm.com>

On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> This mailbox driver implements a mailbox which signals transmitted data
> via an ARM smc (secure monitor call) instruction. The mailbox receiver
> is implemented in firmware and can synchronously return data when it
> returns execution to the non-secure world again.
> An asynchronous receive path is not implemented.
> This allows the usage of a mailbox to trigger firmware actions on SoCs
> which either don't have a separate management processor or on which such
> a core is not available. A user of this mailbox could be the SCP
> interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mailbox/Kconfig           |   8 ++
>  drivers/mailbox/Makefile          |   2 +
>  drivers/mailbox/arm-smc-mailbox.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 182 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/arm-smc-mailbox.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> index c5731e5..5664b7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
> @@ -170,4 +170,12 @@ config BCM_FLEXRM_MBOX
>           Mailbox implementation of the Broadcom FlexRM ring manager,
>           which provides access to various offload engines on Broadcom
>           SoCs. Say Y here if you want to use the Broadcom FlexRM.
> +
> +config ARM_SMC_MBOX
> +       tristate "Generic ARM smc mailbox"
> +       depends on OF && HAVE_ARM_SMCCC
> +       help
> +         Generic mailbox driver which uses ARM smc calls to call into
> +         firmware for triggering mailboxes.
> +
>  endif
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> index d54e412..8ec6869 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
> @@ -35,3 +35,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_BCM_FLEXRM_MBOX) += bcm-flexrm-mailbox.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_APCS_IPC)    += qcom-apcs-ipc-mailbox.o
>
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TEGRA_HSP_MBOX)   += tegra-hsp.o
> +
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SMC_MBOX)     += arm-smc-mailbox.o
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/arm-smc-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/arm-smc-mailbox.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..578aed2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/arm-smc-mailbox.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
> +/*
> + *  Copyright (C) 2016,2017 ARM Ltd.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This device provides a mechanism for emulating a mailbox by using
> + * smc calls, allowing a "mailbox" consumer to sit in firmware running
> + * on the same core.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +
Please have relook at what headers are really needed.

> +#define ARM_SMC_MBOX_SMC               (0 << 0)
> +#define ARM_SMC_MBOX_HVC               (1 << 0)
> +#define ARM_SMC_MBOX_METHOD_MASK       (1 << 0)
> +
Maybe have only
   #define ARM_SMC_MBOX_HVC    BIT(0)

> +struct arm_smc_chan_data {
> +       u32 function_id;
> +       u32 flags;
> +};
> +
> +static int arm_smc_send_data(struct mbox_chan *link, void *data)
> +{
> +       struct arm_smc_chan_data *chan_data = link->con_priv;
> +       u32 function_id = chan_data->function_id;
> +       struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +       u32 msg = *(u32 *)data;
> +
> +       if ((chan_data->flags & ARM_SMC_MBOX_METHOD_MASK) == ARM_SMC_MBOX_SMC)
> +               arm_smccc_smc(function_id, msg, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> +       else
> +               arm_smccc_hvc(function_id, msg, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> +
       if (chan_data->flags & ARM_SMC_MBOX_HVC)
               arm_smccc_hvc(function_id, msg, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
       else
               arm_smccc_smc(function_id, msg, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);

is simpler.

> +       mbox_chan_received_data(link, (void *)res.a0);
> +
Or you can update the 'data' with value from 'a0' ?

> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int arm_smc_startup(struct mbox_chan *link)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void arm_smc_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *link)
> +{
> +}
> +
startup and shutdown can be omitted now.

> +/* This mailbox is synchronous, so we are always done. */
> +static bool arm_smc_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *link)
> +{
> +       return true;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct mbox_chan_ops arm_smc_mbox_chan_ops = {
> +       .send_data      = arm_smc_send_data,
> +       .startup        = arm_smc_startup,
> +       .shutdown       = arm_smc_shutdown,
> +       .last_tx_done   = arm_smc_last_tx_done
> +};
> +
> +static int arm_smc_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +       struct mbox_controller *mbox;
> +       struct arm_smc_chan_data *chan_data;
> +       const char *method;
> +       bool use_hvc = false;
> +       int ret = 0, i;
> +
No need to initialise 'ret'

> +       ret = of_property_count_elems_of_size(dev->of_node, "arm,smc-func-ids",
> +                                             sizeof(u32));
> +       if (ret < 0)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       if (!of_property_read_string(dev->of_node, "method", &method)) {
> +               if (!strcmp("hvc", method)) {
> +                       use_hvc = true;
> +               } else if (!strcmp("smc", method)) {
> +                       use_hvc = false;
> +               } else {
> +                       dev_warn(dev, "invalid \"method\" property: %s\n",
> +                                method);
> +
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       mbox = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mbox), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!mbox)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       mbox->num_chans = ret;
> +       mbox->chans = devm_kcalloc(dev, mbox->num_chans, sizeof(*mbox->chans),
> +                                  GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!mbox->chans)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       chan_data = devm_kcalloc(dev, mbox->num_chans, sizeof(*chan_data),
> +                                GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!chan_data)
> +               return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < mbox->num_chans; i++) {
> +               u32 function_id;
> +
> +               ret = of_property_read_u32_index(dev->of_node,
> +                                                "arm,smc-func-ids", i,
> +                                                &function_id);
> +               if (ret)
> +                       return ret;
> +
> +               chan_data[i].function_id = function_id;
> +               if (use_hvc)
> +                       chan_data[i].flags |= ARM_SMC_MBOX_HVC;
> +               mbox->chans[i].con_priv = &chan_data[i];
> +       }
> +
> +       mbox->txdone_poll = true;
> +       mbox->txdone_irq = false;
> +       mbox->txpoll_period = 1;
> +       mbox->ops = &arm_smc_mbox_chan_ops;
> +       mbox->dev = dev;
> +
> +       ret = mbox_controller_register(mbox);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mbox);
> +       dev_info(dev, "ARM SMC mailbox enabled with %d chan%s.\n",
> +                mbox->num_chans, mbox->num_chans == 1 ? "" : "s");
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int arm_smc_mbox_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +       struct mbox_controller *mbox = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +       mbox_controller_unregister(mbox);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id arm_smc_mbox_of_match[] = {
> +       { .compatible = "arm,smc-mbox", },
> +       {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, arm_smc_mbox_of_match);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver arm_smc_mbox_driver = {
> +       .driver = {
> +               .name = "arm-smc-mbox",
> +               .of_match_table = arm_smc_mbox_of_match,
> +       },
> +       .probe          = arm_smc_mbox_probe,
> +       .remove         = arm_smc_mbox_remove,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(arm_smc_mbox_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Generic ARM smc mailbox driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> --
> 2.9.0
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-02  5:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-30  9:56 [PATCH 0/8] mailbox: arm/arm64: introduce smc triggered mailbox Andre Przywara
2017-06-30  9:56 ` [PATCH 1/8] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox Andre Przywara
2017-07-02  5:55   ` Jassi Brar [this message]
2017-07-23 23:20     ` André Przywara
2017-07-24 17:20       ` Jassi Brar
2017-07-24 17:38         ` Sudeep Holla
2017-07-24 17:52           ` Jassi Brar
2017-06-30  9:56 ` [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: mailbox: add binding doc for the ARM SMC mailbox Andre Przywara
2017-07-07 13:53   ` Rob Herring
2017-07-07 14:35   ` Mark Rutland
2017-07-07 16:06     ` Andre Przywara
2017-06-30  9:56 ` [PATCH 3/8] mailbox: Kconfig: enable ARM SMC mailbox on 64-bit Allwinner SoCs Andre Przywara
2017-06-30  9:56 ` [PATCH 4/8] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: add SCPI support Andre Przywara
2017-06-30  9:56 ` [PATCH 5/8] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: add SCPI DVFS nodes Andre Przywara
2017-06-30  9:56 ` [PATCH 6/8] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: add SCPI sensors support Andre Przywara
2017-06-30  9:56 ` [PATCH 7/8] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: add SCPI power domain support Andre Przywara
2017-06-30  9:56 ` [PATCH 8/8] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: add (unused) MMC clock node Andre Przywara
2017-06-30 12:25 ` [PATCH 0/8] mailbox: arm/arm64: introduce smc triggered mailbox Maxime Ripard
2017-06-30 12:56   ` Andre Przywara
2017-07-05  6:55     ` Maxime Ripard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABb+yY18Aye3wr2A9-+jemqc=VSRyUA+xzKGo9s0G4KCt1ovyA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jassisinghbrar@gmail.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=icenowy@aosc.xyz \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).