linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Venki Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:09:25 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABeCy1YcP1u65CU8n8ug4g7haUq8Vyi55ABZr3hNHFxu429x+w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F18805F.8060901@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat
<srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/20/2012 01:31 AM, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
>
>> Does this look better? Will send separate patch to fix code
>> using num_possible_cpus() when they actually need nr_cpu_ids.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kernel's notion of possible cpus (from include/linux/cpumask.h)
>>  *     cpu_possible_mask- has bit 'cpu' set iff cpu is populatable
>>
>>  *  The cpu_possible_mask is fixed at boot time, as the set of CPU id's
>>  *  that it is possible might ever be plugged in at anytime during the
>>  *  life of that system boot.
>>
>>  #define num_possible_cpus()     cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask)
>>
>> and on x86 cpumask_weight() calls hweight64 and hweight64 (on older kernels
>> and systems with !X86_FEATURE_POPCNT) or a popcnt based alternative.
>>
>> i.e, We needlessly go through this mask based calculation everytime
>> num_possible_cpus() is called.
>>
>> The problem is there with cpu_online_mask() as well, which is fixed value at
>> boot time in !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU case and should not change that often even
>> in HOTPLUG case.
>>
>> Though most of the callers of these two routines are init time (with few
>> exceptions of runtime calls), it is cleaner to use variables
>> and not go through this repeated mask based calculation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/cpumask.h |   10 ++++++++--
>>  kernel/cpu.c            |    5 +++++
>>  kernel/smp.c            |    4 ++++
>>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> index 4f7a632..ac3113b 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
>> @@ -23,10 +23,14 @@ typedef struct cpumask { DECLARE_BITMAP(bits, NR_CPUS); } cpumask_t;
>>
>>  #if NR_CPUS == 1
>>  #define nr_cpu_ids           1
>> +#define nr_possible_cpus     1
>>  #else
>>  extern int nr_cpu_ids;
>> +extern int nr_possible_cpus;
>>  #endif
>>
>> +extern int nr_online_cpus;
>> +
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK
>>  /* Assuming NR_CPUS is huge, a runtime limit is more efficient.  Also,
>>   * not all bits may be allocated. */
>> @@ -81,8 +85,10 @@ extern const struct cpumask *const cpu_present_mask;
>>  extern const struct cpumask *const cpu_active_mask;
>>
>>  #if NR_CPUS > 1
>> -#define num_online_cpus()    cpumask_weight(cpu_online_mask)
>> -#define num_possible_cpus()  cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask)
>> +
>> +#define num_online_cpus()    (nr_online_cpus)
>> +#define num_possible_cpus()  (nr_possible_cpus)
>> +
>>  #define num_present_cpus()   cpumask_weight(cpu_present_mask)
>>  #define num_active_cpus()    cpumask_weight(cpu_active_mask)
>>  #define cpu_online(cpu)              cpumask_test_cpu((cpu), cpu_online_mask)
>> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
>> index 2060c6e..f179baa 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
>> @@ -622,6 +622,9 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_active_bits, CONFIG_NR_CPUS) __read_mostly;
>>  const struct cpumask *const cpu_active_mask = to_cpumask(cpu_active_bits);
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_active_mask);
>>
>> +int nr_online_cpus __read_mostly;
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(nr_online_cpus);
>> +
>>  void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible)
>>  {
>>       if (possible)
>
>
> Did you forget to add:
>
>        nr_possible_cpus = cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask);
>
> inside set_cpu_possible() ?

No. That was intentional as I have that coupled with nr_cpu_ids and
set once after all the bits are set in setup_nr_cpu_ids() instead of
doing for each bit set.

>
>
>> @@ -644,6 +647,8 @@ void set_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, bool online)
>>               cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, to_cpumask(cpu_online_bits));
>>       else
>>               cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, to_cpumask(cpu_online_bits));
>> +
>> +     nr_online_cpus = cpumask_weight(cpu_online_mask);
>>  }
>>
>>  void set_cpu_active(unsigned int cpu, bool active)
>> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
>> index db197d6..106e519 100644
>> --- a/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -658,10 +658,14 @@ early_param("maxcpus", maxcpus);
>>  int nr_cpu_ids __read_mostly = NR_CPUS;
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(nr_cpu_ids);
>>
>> +int nr_possible_cpus __read_mostly = NR_CPUS;
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(nr_possible_cpus);
>> +
>>  /* An arch may set nr_cpu_ids earlier if needed, so this would be redundant */
>>  void __init setup_nr_cpu_ids(void)
>>  {
>>       nr_cpu_ids = find_last_bit(cpumask_bits(cpu_possible_mask),NR_CPUS) + 1;
>> +     nr_possible_cpus = cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask);
>>  }
>>
>>  /* Called by boot processor to activate the rest. */
>
>
> Regards,
> Srivatsa S. Bhat
>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-01-20 23:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-18  2:07 [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-01-18  5:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-18 18:52   ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-18 19:20     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-19 20:01       ` Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-01-19 20:40         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-21  1:01           ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-19 20:43         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-20 23:09           ` Venki Pallipadi [this message]
2012-01-20 23:45             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-20 23:55               ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-23  5:22                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-23 19:28                   ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-24  2:34                     ` [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus -v3 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-01-24 19:22                       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-24 19:30                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-24 21:01                         ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-01-24 23:25                           ` [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus -v4 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-01-26 17:22                             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-26 17:27                             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-01-26 21:25                               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-26 23:22                             ` Andrew Morton
2012-01-27 23:58                               ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-01  0:17                                 ` [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus -v5 Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-01 22:01                                   ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-02 20:03                                     ` Rusty Russell
2012-02-02 20:19                                       ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-02 21:00                                         ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-13 19:54                                       ` Tony Luck
2012-02-13 20:04                                         ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-13 20:25                                         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 20:43                                           ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-13 20:55                                             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 20:44                                           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-13 21:57                                             ` Tony Luck
2012-02-14  9:25                                               ` Rusty Russell
2012-02-14 21:35                                                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-14 23:00                                                   ` Tony Luck
2012-02-14 22:49                                                 ` [PATCH 0/3] Cleanup raw handling of online/possible map Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-14 22:49                                                   ` [PATCH 1/3] hexagon: Avoid raw handling of cpu_possible_map Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-14 22:49                                                   ` [PATCH 2/3] mips: Avoid raw handling of cpu_possible_map/cpu_online_map Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-27 22:19                                                     ` David Daney
2012-02-14 22:49                                                   ` [PATCH 3/3] um: Avoid raw handling of cpu_online_map Venkatesh Pallipadi
2012-02-27 21:55                                   ` [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus -v5 David Daney
2012-02-27 22:07                                     ` Andrew Morton
2012-02-27 22:16                                       ` David Daney
2012-03-01 18:32                                         ` Venki Pallipadi
2012-02-28  5:01                                       ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABeCy1YcP1u65CU8n8ug4g7haUq8Vyi55ABZr3hNHFxu429x+w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=venki@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).