linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
To: willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Network Devel Mailing List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	y2038 Mailman List <y2038@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] socket: Disentangle SOCK_RCVTSTAMPNS from SOCK_RCVTSTAMP
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 21:06:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABeXuvqgPE_Cft+T0fSw8zT09uCKWQGUB+bVNqQDk6fOinn8rA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF=yD-JGh23sA_6eUtBq8=wSZ5g=nipmhdr1WwjP5th51qEtiQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 7:59 PM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 3:59 AM Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > SOCK_RCVTSTAMPNS is never set alone. SOCK_RCVTSTAMP
> > is always set along with SOCK_RCVTSTAMPNS. This leads to
> > checking for two flag states whenever we need to check for
> > SOCK_RCVTSTAMPS.
> >
> > Also SOCK_RCVTSTAMPS was the only flag that needed to be
> > checked in order to verify if either of the two flags are
> > set. But, the two features are not actually dependent on
> > each other. This artificial dependency creates more
> > confusion.
>
> This is done so that the hot path only has to check one flag
> in the common case where no timestamp is requested.

In that case we could just check it this way:

if (newsk->sk_flags & SK_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP)

We are already doing this in many places.

I do not see any other reason for the two timestamps to be intertwined.

Do you have any objections to using this patch and replacing the
checks as above?

-Deepa

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-25  5:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-24  2:20 [PATCH 0/8] net: y2038-safe socket timestamps Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-24  2:20 ` [PATCH 1/8] arch: Use asm-generic/socket.h when possible Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-24  2:20 ` [PATCH 2/8] sockopt: Rename SO_TIMESTAMP* to SO_TIMESTAMP*_OLD Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-25  3:58   ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-30 22:38     ` Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-30 23:33       ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-24  2:20 ` [PATCH 3/8] socket: Disentangle SOCK_RCVTSTAMPNS from SOCK_RCVTSTAMP Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-25  3:59   ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-25  5:06     ` Deepa Dinamani [this message]
2018-11-25 14:18       ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-25 18:19         ` David Miller
2018-11-30 22:16           ` Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-30 23:31             ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-24  2:20 ` [PATCH 4/8] arch: sparc: Override struct __kernel_old_timeval Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-24  2:20 ` [PATCH 5/8] socket: Use old_timeval types for socket timestamps Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-24  2:20 ` [PATCH 6/8] socket: Add struct sock_timeval Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-24 19:37   ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-25  2:09     ` David Miller
2018-11-25  4:52     ` Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-25 20:50       ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-26 16:33         ` Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-24  2:20 ` [PATCH 7/8] socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMP[NS]_NEW Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-25  3:59   ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-25  4:17     ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-25  5:28       ` Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-25  5:55         ` Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-25 14:38           ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-25 14:33         ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-25 22:35           ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-11-26  0:25             ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-30 22:43           ` Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-30 23:37             ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-24  2:20 ` [PATCH 8/8] socket: Add SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW Deepa Dinamani
2018-11-25  4:00   ` Willem de Bruijn
2018-11-25  5:07     ` Deepa Dinamani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CABeXuvqgPE_Cft+T0fSw8zT09uCKWQGUB+bVNqQDk6fOinn8rA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=deepa.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=y2038@lists.linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).