From: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
"Hyser,Chris" <chris.hyser@oracle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] sched: prctl() and cgroup interaction
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 18:30:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABk29NvYfAAREeBV-gcoQa+LijphCUJXqeJLWjgPr_PTYumUMQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210401133917.590280797@infradead.org>
Hi Peter,
I walked through the reference counting, and it seems good to me
(though it did take a few passes to fully digest the invariants for
the fat cookie stuff).
> +unsigned long sched_core_alloc_cookie(unsigned int type)
> {
> struct sched_core_cookie *ck = kmalloc(sizeof(*ck), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!ck)
> return 0;
> - refcount_set(&ck->refcnt, 1);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(type > GROUP_COOKIE);
> + sched_core_init_cookie(ck, type);
> sched_core_get();
>
> - return (unsigned long)ck;
> + return (unsigned long)ck | type;
> }
This feels like it needs to be stronger than a WARN_ON_ONCE; could
create a corrupted address that we later try to kfree().
Also, for my own edification, why will the bottom two bits here always be 0?
> -unsigned long sched_core_alloc_cookie(void)
> +static inline void *cookie_ptr(unsigned long cookie)
> +{
> + return (void *)(cookie & ~3UL);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int cookie_type(unsigned long cookie)
> +{
> + return cookie & 3;
> +}
s/3/FAT_COOKIE
> +#define FAT_COOKIE 0x03
Move to sched.h to group with TASK/GROUP_COOKIE?
> +static unsigned long __sched_core_fat_cookie(struct task_struct *p,
> + void **spare_fat,
> + unsigned long cookie)
> +{
This function looks good to me, but could use some more comments about
the pre/post-condition assumptions. Ie. cookie already has a get()
associated with it, caller is expected to kfree the spare_fat.
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&fat_lock, flags);
> + n = rb_find_add(&fat->node, &fat_root, fat_cmp);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fat_lock, flags);
> +
> + if (n) {
> + sched_core_put_fat(fat);
> + fat = node_2_fat(n);
This put() doesn't seem strictly necessary; caller will be
unconditionally freeing the spare_fat. Keep anyway for completeness,
but add a comment?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-03 1:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-01 13:10 [PATCH 0/9] sched: Core scheduling interfaces Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-01 13:10 ` [PATCH 1/9] sched: Allow sched_core_put() from atomic context Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-01 13:10 ` [PATCH 2/9] sched: Implement core-sched assertions Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-01 13:10 ` [PATCH 3/9] sched: Trivial core scheduling cookie management Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-01 20:04 ` Josh Don
2021-04-02 7:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-01 13:10 ` [PATCH 4/9] sched: Default core-sched policy Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-21 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-21 14:31 ` Chris Hyser
2021-04-01 13:10 ` [PATCH 5/9] sched: prctl() core-scheduling interface Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-07 17:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-18 3:52 ` Joel Fernandes
2021-04-01 13:10 ` [PATCH 6/9] kselftest: Add test for core sched prctl interface Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-01 13:10 ` [PATCH 7/9] sched: Cgroup core-scheduling interface Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-02 0:34 ` Josh Don
2021-04-01 13:10 ` [PATCH 8/9] rbtree: Remove const from the rb_find_add() comparator Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-01 13:10 ` [PATCH 9/9] sched: prctl() and cgroup interaction Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-03 1:30 ` Josh Don [this message]
2021-04-06 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-04 23:39 ` [PATCH 0/9] sched: Core scheduling interfaces Tejun Heo
2021-04-05 18:46 ` Joel Fernandes
2021-04-06 14:16 ` Tejun Heo
2021-04-18 1:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2021-04-19 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-21 13:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-21 14:45 ` Chris Hyser
2021-04-06 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-06 16:08 ` Tejun Heo
2021-04-07 18:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-07 16:50 ` Michal Koutný
2021-04-07 18:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-08 13:25 ` Michal Koutný
2021-04-08 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-09 0:16 ` Josh Don
2021-04-19 11:30 ` Tejun Heo
2021-04-20 1:17 ` Josh Don
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CABk29NvYfAAREeBV-gcoQa+LijphCUJXqeJLWjgPr_PTYumUMQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=chris.hyser@oracle.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).